Re: Joe Sixpack and his TV

>(...It's better exposure
>than five seconds of Tim with Connie Chung.)

Connie: "So it's really true that you're an anarchist? That you believe that
         semi-*automatic weapons* and strong *cryptography* should be *freely*
         available to *everyone*? and that strong cryptography on a *public*
         network like the *internet* will bring about the collapse of nation
         states all over the *world*?"

Tim:    "Yes."

Connie: "But, what about *democracy*? What the will of the *people*?"

Tim:    "What about them?"

A little more than 5 seconds, but I believe that captures her inflection
pretty nicely, don't you think?

Cheers,
Bob Hettinga


-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com)
Shipwright Development Corporation, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131
USA (617) 323-7923
"Reality is not optional." --Thomas Sowell
>>>>Phree Phil: Email: zldf@clark.net  http://www.netresponse.com/zldf <<<<<

It also captures Tim nicely. I'll point out, though, that exchanges
like that can be handled properly or badly. Doing it right means
answering truthfully but in a way that explains your position rather
than alienating the audiance.

When you have time to answer questions like that (TV isn't a medium
suitable for this) the right way to answer the last one is to do
something like referencing Thoreau. By the way, I like the opening of
Civil Disobediance so much I thought I'd post it.

         I heartily accept the  motto, "That government is  best
    which governs least"; and I should  like to see it acted  up
    to more rapidly and systematically.  Carried out, it finally
    amounts to this, which  also I believe--"That government  is
    best which governs not  at all"; and  when men are  prepared
    for it, that will be the  kind of government which the  will
    have.

Perry

Robert Hettinga writes:
> >(...It's better exposure
> >than five seconds of Tim with Connie Chung.)
> 
> Connie: "So it's really true that you're an anarchist? That you believe that
>          semi-*automatic weapons* and strong *cryptography* should
>          be *freely* available to *everyone*? and that strong
>          cryptography on a *public* network like the *internet* will
>          bring about the collapse of nation states all over the
>          *world*?"
> 
> Tim:    "Yes."
> 
> Connie: "But, what about *democracy*? What the will of the *people*?"
> 
> Tim:    "What about them?"
> 
> A little more than 5 seconds, but I believe that captures her inflection
> pretty nicely, don't you think?