NODE 0c8649f2Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
patrick@Verity.COM (Patrick Horgan)Wed, 13 Sep 95 08:42:57 PDT
>
> Sure. I'll respect their privacy as much as they, and the
> organizations they oversee, respect mine. I'll use as the
> respresentative organizations the IRS and the Social Security
> Administration, which respects my pricvacy so much that they use
> prison inmates to process paperwork.
>
> If I was in a nasty mood, I'd add the USPS.
>
> Sarcasm aside, they show no interest in other people's
> privacy. Why should we go out of our way to do anything but show them
> how bad the situation is?
>
> Adam
Oh please! Some clerk browses the internet and you don't want to respect
their privacy because of the IRS? This makes sense how? I suppose that
you're going to dig up information about me and spread it around the
internet because you have issues about the company I work for?
Suppose someone did something bad to you and justified it by saying that
harvard is an elitist school that once did something bad to their uncle.
Patrick
_______________________________________________________________________
/ These opinions are mine, and not Verity's (except by coincidence;). \
| (\ |
| Patrick J. Horgan Verity Inc. \\ Have |
| patrick@verity.com 1550 Plymouth Street \\ _ Sword |
| Phone : (415)960-7600 Mountain View \\/ Will |
| FAX : (415)960-7750 California 94303 _/\\ Travel |
\___________________________________________________________\)__________/
NODE 5ee86df5Re: Whitehouse "dissident" web site monitoring?
adam@bwh.harvard.edu (Adam Shostack)Wed, 13 Sep 95 14:33:33 PDT
(Phill Hallam Baker's request that we respect the privacy of
Government employees started this thread)
| > Sure. I'll respect their privacy as much as they, and the
| > organizations they oversee, respect mine. I'll use as the
| > respresentative organizations the IRS and the Social Security
| > Administration, which respects my pricvacy so much that they use
| > prison inmates to process paperwork.
| >
| > If I was in a nasty mood, I'd add the USPS.
| >
| > Sarcasm aside, they show no interest in other people's
| > privacy. Why should we go out of our way to do anything but show them
| > how bad the situation is?
| Oh please! Some clerk browses the internet and you don't want to respect
| their privacy because of the IRS? This makes sense how? I suppose that
| you're going to dig up information about me and spread it around the
| internet because you have issues about the company I work for?
First off, I was being somewhat sarcastic, as you might have
noticed from several things, not the least of which was the phrase
'sarcasm aside.'
That said, why should I respect the privacy of government
employees? There is a substantial difference between government and
private companies, in that I am not compelled in any way to do
business any private company.
Adam
--
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
-Hume