NODE 67c49179Re: Why ecash is traceable
"Pat Farrell" <pfarrell@netcom.com>Fri, 15 Sep 95 05:03:32 PDT
tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May) writes:
> Hal, a very nice summary!
Yes, good job Hal.
> Why not "online clearing" as the preferred model, then?
Because you lose most (all?) anonymous abilities. (I think)
> (There are more abstract ways of viewing this advantage. While mere
> software is always duplicable, and cash numbers are of course duplicable,
> one thing that is not duplicable is this: "the first agent to present a
> valid number at this bank." There can be only one of these, and this
> uniqueness is what keeps the currency from collapsing, what introduces
> _conservation_ into the system.)
>
> Well, since Alice knows her own blinding factors, she will always be able
> to say to the bank: "My cash will look like this. Watch for it."
So when the money Alice gave to Bob gets deposited by TCMay,
That it was Alice's is instantly known. This is not how physical cash works.
There is a chain from TCMay through some number of steps to Bob.
Even if you can't find it with this single case, you could use
a zero-knowledge type proof to slowly uncover Bob's identity.
I keep wanting to believe in ecash, but I'm not convinced
it can exist.
Pat
Pat Farrell Grad Student http://www.isse.gmu.edu/students/pfarrell
Info. Systems & Software Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
PGP key available on homepage #include <standard.disclaimer>
NODE 7ba8ab16Re: Why ecash is traceable
kelso@netcom.com (Tom Rollins)Fri, 15 Sep 95 05:23:39 PDT
Pat Farrell says:
> Because you lose most (all?) anonymous abilities. (I think)
> So when the money Alice gave to Bob gets deposited by TCMay,
> That it was Alice's is instantly known. This is not how physical cash works.
>
> There is a chain from TCMay through some number of steps to Bob.
> Even if you can't find it with this single case, you could use
> a zero-knowledge type proof to slowly uncover Bob's identity.
>
> I keep wanting to believe in ecash, but I'm not convinced
> it can exist.
Just a little humor...
Perhaps Electronic Cash has a sound.
Phone Phreakers have something called a Redbox.
This device makes the sound of a quarter.
When an ATT pay phone asks you to deposit $1.75
you just make the sound of 7 quarters... :)
NODE 645f2442Re: Why ecash is traceable
"Henry W. Farkas" <hfarkas@ims.advantis.com>Fri, 15 Sep 95 07:35:57 PDT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 15 Sep 1995, Tom Rollins wrote:
> Just a little humor...
> Perhaps Electronic Cash has a sound.
> Phone Phreakers have something called a Redbox.
> This device makes the sound of a quarter.
> When an ATT pay phone asks you to deposit $1.75
> you just make the sound of 7 quarters... :)
New Zen koan? What is the sound of 7 quarters *not* being deposited?
===========================================================================
Henry W. Farkas | Me? Speak for IBM? Fat chance.
hfarkas@ims.advantis.com |------------------------------------------------
hfarkas@vnet.ibm.com | http://newstand.ims.advantis.com/henry
henry@nhcc.com | http://www.nhcc.com/~henry
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PGP 6.2.2 Key fingerprint: AA D0 F5 44 C1 8C 11 52 B3 80 34 1C CE 38 EC 53
Public key at: pgp-public-keys@pgp.mit.edu, and other popular key servers.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brought to you by Henry's Hardware: Home of the Pretty Good Hack "We're not
fast, but it's not bad, and we're cheaper than the guy down the street!"
===========================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Auto-signed with Bryce's Auto-PGP v1.0beta
iQCVAwUBMFmPJKDthkLkvrK9AQEPdgP/S7OTS7EjSSNiwFgFPFdgs+gymPKVgUaT
5iuSEXGxHJDSzdZocuA7NoT4OUvpYriC7Lkk3uaSQ5kNPX/2veXzEowh1+nFfDmq
8Lgay1MpanwOlZC3F/VrBJP6m2eZtUdhN+qejccqyU0EiQZN1idUkpFCel9D6lu+
TYmkRLVGDOc=
=KjF7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----