NODE 798f3f21Re: WAS_tem (fwd)
keelings@wu1.wl.aecl.ca (S. Keeling)Sat, 16 Sep 95 13:12:22 PDT
Incoming from Rev. Ben:
>
> On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, James A. Donald wrote:
>
> > If you draw a picture using paintbrush of an underage person engaging
> > in sexual conduct, you are in violation of this proposed legislation.
>
> Doesn't that directly contradict the stated purpose of existing child
[snip]
>
> Do the lawyers on the list want to pipe up?
On cypherpunks?!? Whatever for? I imagine there's already a
rousing discussion going on about this somewhere in AOL. Take it there.
--
"Remember, obsolescence (Win95) isn't an accident; it's an art form!"
keelings@wu1.wl.aecl.ca s. keeling, aecl - whiteshell labs
NODE c15d8157Re: WAS_tem (fwd)
Black Unicorn <unicorn@polaris.mindport.net>Sun, 17 Sep 95 15:40:51 PDT
On Sat, 16 Sep 1995, S. Keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Rev. Ben:
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 1995, James A. Donald wrote:
> >
> > > If you draw a picture using paintbrush of an underage person engaging
> > > in sexual conduct, you are in violation of this proposed legislation.
> >
> > Doesn't that directly contradict the stated purpose of existing child
> [snip]
> >
> > Do the lawyers on the list want to pipe up?
The current child pornography laws are entirely misguided and poorly written.
> --
>
> "Remember, obsolescence (Win95) isn't an accident; it's an art form!"
> keelings@wu1.wl.aecl.ca s. keeling, aecl - whiteshell labs
>
---
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information