NODE 9e8cdf2cRe: NYT on Netscape Crack
Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>Wed, 20 Sep 95 09:32:31 PDT
> You could do that, but thats not how C does things. C allocates these
> things on the stack.
Nope. Just because almost all machines anyone is every going to use
in their lifetimes are stack-based doesn't mean C is stack-based.
The C compiler I once used on a LispMachine had no stack.
/r$
NODE 0e6e35ecRe: NYT on Netscape Crack
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>Wed, 20 Sep 95 09:39:46 PDT
Rich Salz writes:
> > You could do that, but thats not how C does things. C allocates these
> > things on the stack.
>
> Nope. Just because almost all machines anyone is every going to use
> in their lifetimes are stack-based doesn't mean C is stack-based.
Effectively the same thing for our purposes, neh?
.pm