Brand e-cash implementation?

Have there been any implementations, even as trials, of Brands' protocols?
Do any ecash systems on the drawing board even include real user anonymity?

A. Michael Froomkin        | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
Associate Professor of Law | mfroomki@umiami.ir.miami.edu
U. Miami School of Law     | 
P.O. Box 248087            | It's hot here.  And humid.
Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA |
See (soon to move to its real home): http://www.law.miami.edu/~mfroomki

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Michael Froomkin <mfroomki@umiami.ir.miami.edu> wrote:
>
> Have there been any implementations, even as trials, of Brands' protocols?
> Do any ecash systems on the drawing board even include real user anonymity?


Could someone point me to Brand's electronic money protocol?  I have heard of
it and would like to learn more.  If it is a discussable topic then please
someone try to convince me that it is better than Chaum's or
Chaum's-plus-anonymity-both-ways, or some other candidate for E-Money
Protocol Which Has Official Cypherpunk Blessing.


(Hopefully a discussion will ensue and rescue this article from that room in
Data Hell where posts that ask for help but contribute nothing are sent...)


Bryce
signatures follow:


(new .sig with URL coming soon!  Stay tuned for more exciting adventures...)
                                    +                                           
      public key on keyservers      /.      island Life in a chaos sea        
      or via finger 0x617c6db9      /           bryce.wilcox@colorado.edu     
                                    ---*                                     

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Bryce's Auto-PGP v1.0beta3

iQCVAwUBMFTm5fWZSllhfG25AQHpOQP+MXO8vsxuFnQfaH5cE1t75jihM+m4RsRx
vaSHwYZJORdEqdZ4qhLj1WaLqRra+GiSbCiEy2i2kbA5ATyc+1huXCKoIsgF4Rp+
NUBlSG3X1N2iFq2DTvboCanajq0MMcLp1LOlzLPvjoEDuxnZhvSlk2LN6fg9ds3w
M4DflyKOmwo=
=DqDg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----