NODE 718ed46fNo Subject
nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)Thu, 28 Sep 95 21:39:53 PDT
Subject: Re: 25 Crays a Year to Break STT
> Although no encryption system was totally secure, Mr Dent
> estimated it would take "25 Cray supercomputers a year" to
> break the STT codes.
Is it just me, or does someone need to be humbled?
STTbruter anyone?
NODE 71ff223dNo Subject
nelson@santafe.edu (Nelson Minar)Fri, 29 Sep 95 00:13:24 PDT
>>Although no encryption system was totally secure, Mr Dent estimated
>>it would take "25 Cray supercomputers a year" to break the STT codes.
>Is it just me, or does someone need to be humbled?
They're certainly calling out for some external evaluation.
Has anyone read the specs? Care to summarize? I'm curious if the "25
crays one year" comment is intended to mean anything, or if it's just
some foolish PR person who doesn't understand what he's talking about.
NODE fedf5f9bRe: your mail
sameer <sameer@c2.org>Fri, 29 Sep 95 00:27:10 PDT
As if the ITAR would allow something like that to be exported?
As if microsoft would actually produce a product which the ITAR
wouldn't allow to export?
Sounds like PR bullshit. Compared to this Netscape's PR looks
-good-.
Stay tuned for Hack Microsoft. Community ConneXion gets into
the T-shirt biz. ;-)
>
> >>Although no encryption system was totally secure, Mr Dent estimated
> >>it would take "25 Cray supercomputers a year" to break the STT codes.
> >Is it just me, or does someone need to be humbled?
>
> They're certainly calling out for some external evaluation.
>
> Has anyone read the specs? Care to summarize? I'm curious if the "25
> crays one year" comment is intended to mean anything, or if it's just
> some foolish PR person who doesn't understand what he's talking about.
>
--
sameer Voice: 510-601-9777
Community ConneXion FAX: 510-601-9734
An Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.org