Re: Netscape 2.0 beta

Steven Champeon said:

> One thing that I found with the newsreader was that it doesn't
> do POP correctly. No matter what you do with your mail, it still
> doesn't check for read vs. unread articles. This is fine when you
> have a mailbox with one message. It can be annoying when you have
> 110 messages in your mailbox and don't want to 1) delete them or
> 2) download them twice.

Neither pop 2 nor pop 3 tell you whether you've read a message or not.
pop 2 does bump up the current number with an ACKS, but if you move around
with READ n, then that's useless.  pop 3 doesn't do that.

I just reread the rfcs to make sure that I wasn't missing anything,
(RFC 1725: Post Office Protocol - Version 3, RFC 937: Post Office Protocol -
Version 2).  Am I missing something?

Patrick
   _______________________________________________________________________
  /  These opinions are mine, and not Verity's (except by coincidence;).  \
 |                                                       (\                |
 |  Patrick J. Horgan         Verity Inc.                 \\    Have       |
 |  patrick@verity.com        1550 Plymouth Street         \\  _ Sword     | 
 |  Phone : (415)960-7600     Mountain View                 \\/    Will    | 
 |  FAX   : (415)960-7750     California 94303             _/\\     Travel | 
  \___________________________________________________________\)__________/

Netscape should be supporting IMAP instead of POP. POP has a tendency
to hose your mailbox and lose mail every once in awhile.

-Ray