NODE cc8a2c74Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
tien@well.sf.ca.us (Lee Tien)Mon, 23 Oct 95 18:49:20 PDT
s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Oct 1995, t byfield wrote:
>
>> At 9:42 AM 10/18/95, Hal wrote:
>>
>> Of course. The problem is that protocols as implemented permit
>> header-forging: it's a practical fact of the net, and one that maybe
>> shouldn't be overlooked on (basically vague) 'moral' grounds, any more than
>
>The courts can't overlook it either. There goes liability. If I posted
>pirated software from this account, according to what you're saying, I could
>claim a forgery and show reasonable doubt.
How difficult is it to forge headers? How difficult is it to trace a
message to the actual sender if the header is forged? Is there a way to
quantify traceability on a simple scale, for rough purposes?
Lee
Lee Tien
Attorney
tien@well.sf.ca.us
(510) 525-0817 voice
(510) 525-3015 fax
NODE 1c9df619Re: Anonymity: A Modest Proposal
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>Mon, 23 Oct 95 19:14:52 PDT
Lee Tien writes:
> How difficult is it to forge headers?
Trivial. If you want to make even the Received: headers look right, it
takes a bit more work, but its possible.
> How difficult is it to trace a message to the actual sender if the
> header is forged?
If they know what they are doing, its very hard.
Perry