// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: From Bill Frezza: Electronic Warfare

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 345a28a1Re: From Bill Frezza: Electronic Warfare
On Tue, 31 Oct 1995, Bill Frezza <frezza@interramp.com> wrote:

> Attached is a column that will appear on the op-ed page of tomorrow's
> (10/30) Communications Week that was stimulated largely by a report filed

> Cypherpunks mailing list (majordomo@toad.com) you can get some excellent

list address is cypherpunks@toad.com
list manager is majordomo@toad.com
sending list mail to majordomo will not work

> cyberspace.  Heightened conflict is inevitable.  Expect the rhetoric to get
> a lot hotter as the government spinmeisters labor to keep us focused on
> public enemies while frantically trying to keep its hand in every citizens
> pocket and its eyes on every bankbook.

the entire issue is not tied to money
the gummint is not just looking for more money

can't anyone from the media get it right

better story than w$j can make though
congratulations you're more clueful than the average media stooge
NODE dc712da8Re: From Bill Frezza: Electronic Warfare
On Wed, 1 Nov 1995, Anonymous wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Oct 1995, Bill Frezza <frezza@interramp.com> wrote:
> 
> > Attached is a column that will appear on the op-ed page of tomorrow's
> > (10/30) Communications Week that was stimulated largely by a report filed
> 
> > Cypherpunks mailing list (majordomo@toad.com) you can get some excellent
> 
> list address is cypherpunks@toad.com
> list manager is majordomo@toad.com
> sending list mail to majordomo will not work

Sending mail without valid commands to majordomo will give you a help
file.  You don't *really* want the actual list address to be published
everywhere, do you? I think the noise/signal ratio is high enough already.

cypherpunks-request@toad.com would have been better, because it gives a 
more specific help file. URL would have been better still. But not the 
address.

-rich