NODE af18dec7Re: The future will be easy to use
"E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>Wed, 29 Nov 1995 02:32:01 +0800
From: IN%"raph@c2.org" "Raph Levien" 27-NOV-1995 17:11:37.38
It _is_ doable. I know the skill is out there. Wei Dai, Eric Young, Peter
Gutmann, and others have proved themselves quit capable of writing good
solid code. Sameer Parekh has done an incredible job with PR. Phil Karn,
Dan Bernstein, and some others (who I'm not sure want to be named) are
talking to the government. GUI I'm less sure about, but I'd hope that some
cpunks would come out of the woodwork.
------------------
If you'd like a non-programmer user to test out the user interface, I'm
available to some degree if it's usable on a VAX (and to a lesser degree for
MS-DOS). Given the number of people like me who are interacting using a non-GUI
interface for various reasons (including using a mainframe for email), I would
suggest not making it specifically GUI-dependant.
-Allen
NODE 5daa886eRe: The future will be easy to use
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>Wed, 29 Nov 1995 02:41:36 +0800
"E. ALLEN SMITH" writes:
> Phil Karn, Dan Bernstein, and some others (who I'm not sure want to
> be named) are talking to the government.
If you call lawsuits "talking", not that talking is important.
.pm
NODE 773ab1b2Re: The future will be easy to use
Raph Levien <raph@c2.org>Wed, 29 Nov 1995 04:07:54 +0800
On Tue, 28 Nov 1995, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
> If you'd like a non-programmer user to test out the user interface, I'm
> available to some degree if it's usable on a VAX (and to a lesser degree for
> MS-DOS). Given the number of people like me who are interacting using a non-GUI
> interface for various reasons (including using a mainframe for email), I would
> suggest not making it specifically GUI-dependant.
Unfortunately, it's _way_ too early to recruit volunteers to test out the
user interface. But thanks.
Raph