Re: The future will be easy to use

At 01:03 PM 11/28/95 EST, Carl Ellison wrote:
>That's true.  What the user would have to see is some icon (or, for
>text-bound folks, a temporary unique string) until the user chooses and
>assigns the appropriate alias.  That icon would have no meaning by itself.
>It would acquire a meaning by being associated with some message or set of
>messages:

Better method:  Creator of the key names it:  Usually after himself or
his role:  The recipients key database detects and resolves cases 
where two different keys have identical names in accordance with
certification rules.

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 22:57:25 -0800
>From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
>
>At 01:03 PM 11/28/95 EST, Carl Ellison wrote:
>>That's true.  What the user would have to see is some icon (or, for
>>text-bound folks, a temporary unique string) until the user chooses and
>>assigns the appropriate alias.  That icon would have no meaning by itself.
>>It would acquire a meaning by being associated with some message or set of
>>messages:
>
>Better method:  Creator of the key names it:  Usually after himself or
>his role:  The recipients key database detects and resolves cases 
>where two different keys have identical names in accordance with
>certification rules.

That's today's method, more or less.  It doesn't address my needs.  The
name you pick for your key may or may not mean anything to me.  It might be
pronounceable, giving it some advantage over a radix-64 string, but it
might also be non-unique, making it worthless as an identifier.

What means something to me is whatever name (or symbol) I assign to the
person behind the key in question.  That's the one in my mind and therefore
the only one of interest to me.  You, however, don't know what's in my
mind.  You don't even know my preferred symbol set.

 - Carl

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl M. Ellison      cme@tis.com    http://www.clark.net/pub/cme	   |
|Trusted Information Systems, Inc.   http://www.tis.com/                   |
|3060 Washington Road          PGP 2.6.2:  61E2DE7FCB9D7984E9C8048BA63221A2|
|Glenwood MD  21738         Tel:(301)854-6889      FAX:(301)854-5363       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMLyCVlQXJENzYr45AQEqEQP+O23i/6bcPX60i249150mv39WdoO0sL1w
pUtiZRs2PLACYTMA+DVP28upD4HRrk3/5Vd76EojPm5R8P/DWP190CccRo0t4xZ4
fM1kqEanvw1unV3Kd37ZjhD7tme5oN/v0ipjB2ETsrnowJnZ8HYhiF+WClK5ShhD
gEAg71NQux8=
=RyHR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----