NODE 679e3cddRe: ADDRESS DATABASE?
nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)Sat, 16 Dec 1995 04:40:47 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Sandfort-8802 unit:
>> This took about a minute using a shabby consumer-level DB.
>> *Now* do you get it? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > hint hint hint hint <
>Nope. MY name isn't on your list. In addition, my home phone
>number is unlisted--therefore contracturally unavailable for
>resale. *Now* do you get it?
It's kind of cool how much faith you have in the idea that
your number is unlisted, considering the fact that you started
this thread by griping that someone had the goods on you. The
reason you were "taken aback" is because your beliefs don't
correspond to reality -- "cognitive dissonance," in the lingo.
H
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQBVAwUBMNHGg73g0mNE55u1AQEfcwH9HPcXAyMQPv9ZNQ2MxvBHfTtsIfqw15zG
n7S7yppwR2AsayZgSZQFIDoee0tLRBqEvPFhxNqnOiPCht5PK01YGA==
=gIKw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE 02cfcc63Re: ADDRESS DATABASE?
Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>Fri, 15 Dec 95 16:18:52 PST
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SANDY SANDFORT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C'punks,
On Fri, 15 Dec 1995, Anonymous wrote:
> It's kind of cool how much faith you have in the idea that
> your number is unlisted, considering the fact that you started
> this thread by griping that someone had the goods on you. The
> reason you were "taken aback" is because your beliefs don't
> correspond to reality -- "cognitive dissonance," in the lingo.
1) I have no faith in my number being unlisted, I merely
mentioned my contractural expectation.
2) I was not griping. I was requesting information (of which
"Anonymous" is apparently bereft).
3) Being "taken aback" refers to surprise (look it up). Far
from the meaning of "cognitive dissonance."
"Assuming facts not in evidence," in the lingo.
So what DO you know, "Anonyomous"?
S a n d y
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~