NODE be632199Re: GAK_hit
"James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>Mon, 4 Dec 95 08:02:37 PST
At 09:25 AM 12/4/95 -0500, John Young wrote:
> 12-4-95. W$Jabber:
>
> "Microsoft Probe Spurs Subpoenas Tied to Internet.
> Antitrust Effort Appears Focused on Windows 95 Disabled
> Rival Software."
> The subpoena issued to Netscape may be of particular
> significance. In the estimate of Netscape and industry
> observers,
I regularly use netscape on windows 95, and I conclude that
this subpoena is pure, 100% harassment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
NODE 1cd97077Re: GAK_hit
Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>Mon, 4 Dec 95 22:35:36 PST
James A. Donald wrote:
>
> At 09:25 AM 12/4/95 -0500, John Young wrote:
> > 12-4-95. W$Jabber:
> >
> > "Microsoft Probe Spurs Subpoenas Tied to Internet.
> > Antitrust Effort Appears Focused on Windows 95 Disabled
> > Rival Software."
>
> > The subpoena issued to Netscape may be of particular
> > significance. In the estimate of Netscape and industry
> > observers,
>
> I regularly use netscape on windows 95, and I conclude that
> this subpoena is pure, 100% harassment.
I've heard that when a machine that already has Internet In A
Box, Netscape Navigator personal edition, or some other internet
software with a stack and dialer is upgraded to Win95, the win95
installation may somehow disrupt the functioning of the winsock
or dialer. I've also heard that re-installing the application
will solve the problem. I've never seen the problem myself,
and don't know anything about any subpoena...
--Jeff
--
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.