// COMPLETE THREAD

Chomsky

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 18c4ecd5Chomsky
At 7:07 PM 1/31/96, Alan Bostick wrote:

>In article <ad33b5f134021004e5fb@[205.199.118.202]>,
>tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May) wrote:
>
>> Interesting term, similar to Chomsky's "Manufacturing Consent" (which
>> obviously must've come later...).
>
>Wow, that was fast!  Only two days in the FV FUD flamewar, and already
>someone said "Chomsky".
>
>Alan "Still holding out for 'Hitler'" Bostick


What's the big deal about mentioning Chomsky?

--Tim

Boycott espionage-enabled software!
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net  408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^756839 - 1  | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
NODE b3bc8f4cRe: Chomsky
> What's the big deal about mentioning Chomsky?

huh, chomsky is just another tentacle of tcmay anyway. isn't it funny how
he talks about "manufacturing consent" as though it were some great
overwhelming evil????  he is the one who manufactures consent among the
cypherpunks!!