NODE 2d405beeMicrosoft's CryptoAPI - thoughts?
rickt@psisa.com (Rick Tait)Fri, 26 Jan 1996 05:09:28 +0800
What does everyone think about this? Perhaps I already missed the boat, but
I just found out about it. How would international apps work? Would a data
file encrypted with an app compiled with a US-only CSP (cryptographic
service provider) be able to be loaded by a European equivalent app?
[Info can be found at: http://www.microsoft.com/intdev/inttech/cryptapi.htm]
--
rickt@psa.pencom.com
egalitarian, philosopher, unix cowboy, '68 chevy pickup hacker
NODE 3769fbf5Re: Microsoft's CryptoAPI - thoughts?
futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:26:33 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
rickt@psa.pencom.com writes:
> [Info can be found at: http://www.microsoft.com/intdev/inttech/cryptapi.htm]
Has someone here managed to extract PostScript hardcopy of the CAPI from this
Web page? I tried earlier this evening and wound up with a miniature
ecological disaster on my hands. The page says:
"For ease of online reading and printing, we've provided copies of this
lengthy document in Microsoft Word and Postscript formats."
I grabbed the ZIPped PostScript version and unZIPped it, which resulted in a
single file called "capiapp.ps". Making the wild assumption that this was
indeed a PostScript file, I sent it to the printer and forgot about it for a
while.
An hour later I discovered a chaotic scene in the printer room, as the
printer had spewed about 1.5 reams of raw PostScript printouts. The output bin
had overflowed for a while, spraying paper in several directions. <heavy sigh>
As it turns out, the file unhelpfully begins with
%-12345X@JPL ENTER LANGUAGE=POSTSCRIPT
preceding the usual "%!PS-Adobe-3.0" line. Worse still, it appears that the
capiapp.ps file is actually a catenation of many PostScript files (one per
chapter?), each beginning with a version of this ensnarling line.
I could do some global search-and-replacing, etc., but I think I'll wait for
Microsoft to distribute a decent PS version of this document. Perhaps they
should consider not generating it with MS Word....
Grr!
Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAwUBMQiKcynaAKQPVHDZAQEwQAf/SLkD9a4vP7Vl5md0WzPCE+v0fX83W0Hw
wj0OJLs7gRcyLJx0eLcBxR7G86CGRwRRLat+QbhEPqaiNipQTG0W5EgF+i/6DlCk
y7c8adATFrPCGOjNS49nnPWtpBEUo+q9ZLHYzYkPHnt8k+8q7EZnET/wO9GV8VJg
ZsjjQeslR2/r9KnzyXaFsuQpPI0Vgl7/ilTE03bPWoiHrzQvQTGIABQr5seRORWb
3RDLee1KOfXBPfpzlPNt/K6bcPFu2sRLLMCUAtImm5hSHCjdelkD+3sZAlaJpHwH
Se9osUfNlMM3ohFZydOezjlWsGzIZgLPxMouQgvX2MDcJTwQSe7ZyA==
=XHjr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE 6810f044Re: Microsoft's CryptoAPI - thoughts?
lull@acm.org (John Lull)Sat, 27 Jan 1996 01:17:46 +0800
On Fri, 26 Jan 1996 03:02:56 -0500 (EST), Futplex wrote:
> Has someone here managed to extract PostScript hardcopy of the CAPI from this
> Web page? I tried earlier this evening and wound up with a miniature
> ecological disaster on my hands. The page says:
No problem on a LaserJet 4M.
> "For ease of online reading and printing, we've provided copies of this
> lengthy document in Microsoft Word and Postscript formats."
I tried printing the Word version from WordView, also, and ran into
major problems. It absolutely insisted on setting the printer to
manual feed, and when I tried to print the odd-numbered pages,
WordView crashed complletely.
> Worse still, it appears that the
> capiapp.ps file is actually a catenation of many PostScript files (one per
> chapter?), each beginning with a version of this ensnarling line.
Maybe that's why I couldn't extract odd & even-numbered pages.