NODE 91af5cb3"whom T. C. May has killfiled"
tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)Sat, 20 Jan 1996 11:56:55 +0800
At 11:09 PM 1/19/96, Rich Graves wrote:
>Yusuf's statement that my January 16th email is the first that he had
>heard of the .PWL problem is both patently ridiculous and directly
>contradicted by private email from anonymous sources on this list whom
>T. C. May has killfiled.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
???
Mind explaining this reference? In public, preferably, as the charge was
made here.
If it's a joke, I don't get it.
--Tim May
Boycott espionage-enabled software!
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^756839 - 1 | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
NODE 308cfa8eRe: "whom T. C. May has killfiled"
nobody@alpha.c2.org (Anonymous)Sat, 20 Jan 1996 15:26:18 +0800
Timothy C. May (tcmay@got.net) wrote:
: At 11:09 PM 1/19/96, Rich Graves wrote:
:
: >Yusuf's statement that my January 16th email is the first that he had
: >heard of the .PWL problem is both patently ridiculous and directly
: >contradicted by private email from anonymous sources on this list whom
: >T. C. May has killfiled.
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:
: ???
:
: Mind explaining this reference? In public, preferably, as the charge was
: made here.
:
: If it's a joke, I don't get it.
You killfiled microsoft.com, remember? sheez...
NODE d13d59d2Re: "whom T. C. May has killfiled"
Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>Sun, 21 Jan 1996 04:41:21 +0800
On Fri, 19 Jan 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:
> At 11:09 PM 1/19/96, Rich Graves wrote:
>
> >T. C. May has killfiled.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> ???
>
> Mind explaining this reference? In public, preferably, as the charge was
> made here.
>
> If it's a joke, I don't get it.
I just spent several minutes on a longer response, but on second thought I
think it suffices to say publicly that this was a particularly elliptical
joke, not at Tim's expense, that I retract and apologize for. And I've
received other mail that suggests that my primary assumption was wrong
anyway, about which I'm happy.
I hadn't meant to post that paragraph publicly anyway, since it was a
stupid bluff. Oops. I've verified that it didn't go the other places I'd
sent a version of the article.
And now back to our regularly scheduled programming...
-rich