// COMPLETE THREAD

test

4 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE bd760446test
test, please ignore - 1 copy sent.
NODE d1913f81Re: test
"Ed Carp [khijol SysAdmin]" <erc@dal1820.computek.net> writes:

> test, please ignore - 1 copy sent.

Ed, I've pointed out to you during our mini-flame war that I've been getting
4 copies of your every e-mail: 2 via the cpunks list, 2 directly from your
box cc:'d to me. You _know_ that I've been getting 2 copies of cc:'s not
passing through toad.com, that the problem is at your end, and not at toad.com,
and you should _not_ send test posts to cypherpunks.

I'm sorry if your recent posting flurry was provoked by my question about what
you have contributed to this discussion besides puerile flames of Fred Cohen.

None of the following:
 * your test posts
 * your lack of understanding of anonymous remailers
 * your inability to configure sendmail
have any cryptographic relevance (other than to discredit your technical
knowledge, which you have done quite thoroughly :)

Please stop polluting this mailing list with test messages. Thank you.

(I wish I could set up procmail on this box.)

---

Dr. Dimitri Vulis
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
NODE fc4b9d14Re: test
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> Ed, I've pointed out to you during our mini-flame war that I've been getting
> 4 copies of your every e-mail: 2 via the cpunks list, 2 directly from your
> box cc:'d to me. You _know_ that I've been getting 2 copies of cc:'s not
> passing through toad.com, that the problem is at your end, and not at toad.com,
> and you should _not_ send test posts to cypherpunks.

The problem is *not* at my end, your ignorance is showing.  If it were, 
then everyone would be getting 2 copies of everything I send, and that's 
simply not true.  Some people are getting two copies, but some are only 
getting one copy.

> None of the following:
>  * your test posts
>  * your lack of understanding of anonymous remailers
>  * your inability to configure sendmail
> have any cryptographic relevance (other than to discredit your technical
> knowledge, which you have done quite thoroughly :)

My understanding of anonymous remailers has nothing to do with this - 
I've not posted or emailed through one, so I don't know where this 
comment is coming from.  As for configuring sendmail, I would not be 
afraid to estimate that I've probably configured sendmail for more 
systems than you've ever seen in your entire life, so if my technical 
qualifications are in doubt, they are in doubt only in your own mind.  My 
employer (and all of my employers for the last 16 years) have paid 
relatively well for my technical shills, and continue to do so.

> Please stop polluting this mailing list with test messages. Thank you.

I would suggest that it is *your* lack of technical expertise that is at 
the root of your not neing able to set up procmail.  Besides, if you want 
to filter my posts or email, filter will do the job, and it's so fast and 
easy to set up that I taught an ex- to do it in about 10 minutes - and 
she has trouble finding the on/off switch to her computer.

Please stop polluting the list with your flames.
- --
Ed Carp, N7EKG    			Ed.Carp@linux.org, ecarp@netcom.com
					214/993-3935 voicemail/digital pager
					800/558-3408 SkyPager
Finger ecarp@netcom.com for PGP 2.5 public key		an88744@anon.penet.fi

"Past the wounds of childhood, past the fallen dreams and the broken families,
through the hurt and the loss and the agony only the night ever hears, is a
waiting soul.  Patient, permanent, abundant, it opens its infinite heart and
asks only one thing of you ... 'Remember who it is you really are.'"

                    -- "Losing Your Mind", Karen Alexander and Rick Boyes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMOx1jSS9AwzY9LDxAQFpMAP/WZv/JrA6WIagfL12Jxni+HQH/4lsOMFc
gK51Jeb1HTE7+gPf03yPSFqkW6fp3jZzIN6Mr3PuaB0cOk92irRU9RHd3L4rtyPE
1IJ/KKaoluMO0dOq4duFvpJO1ximKQD7TPyMKDlBZSLbZ5nP6yXogOrH7Aep5fJ+
DkXnkhWVKiw=
=crDC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE 4aa86387Re: test
> The problem is *not* at my end, your ignorance is showing.  If it were, 
> then everyone would be getting 2 copies of everything I send, and that's 
> simply not true.  Some people are getting two copies, but some are only 
> getting one copy.
	This mail arrived twice.

-- 
sameer						Voice:   510-601-9777x3
Community ConneXion				FAX:     510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest")		sameer@c2.org