NODE f252b361Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!)
jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>Thu, 25 Jan 1996 12:31:48 +0800
At 04:21 PM 1/23/96 -0800, Simon Spero wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Jan 1996, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
>> Alan Horowitz writes:
>>>[...]
>> Okay. I think I understand. You're a fruitcake. Easy enough.
>
>The official pastry of the 1996 Cypherpunks.
>
>One might note that Zimmerman isn't, er, a common name for yer typical
>Neo-Nazi... This sort of accusation is sufficient grounds for libel in
>the UK (such accusations have been found to be defamatory, and would
>almost certainly be settled within a few days.
>
>Of course Phil (Hallam Baker) has more experience with this sort of
>thing...
>Simon
Maybe this is common knowledge, but the name "Zimmermann" and crypto had
another relationship, in World War I. If anybody knows more about this
incident than my vague recollection of the famous "Zimmermann cipher" would
you care to tell the story?
NODE 2f6fef2eRe: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!)
hallam@w3.orgFri, 26 Jan 1996 05:30:27 +0800
>Maybe this is common knowledge, but the name "Zimmermann" and crypto had
>another relationship, in World War I. If anybody knows more about this
>incident than my vague recollection of the famous "Zimmermann cipher" would
>you care to tell the story?
I think you mean Zimmerman Telegram. This was sent by the Germans to the
Mexicans through the US Embassy in London and offered Mexico the retur of Texas
in return for entering the war on the German side.
The Brits were tapping the US cables as a matter of course and intercepted and
decrypted the telegram. They could not show it to the US types saying it came
from tapping their embassy so they broke into the German embassy in Mexico and
pilfered another copy of the cipher in another code.
When the Americans were shown how easy it was to decrypt the German telegram
they said "gosh how clever these guys are - no wonder they have an empire". MI5
then managed to get their contact person at the British Embassy in Washington to
effectively suplant the official British Ambassador, setting up a US
Intelligence service for the Americans, in the process practically becomming a
mamber of the US cabinet. [As a footnote Ian Flemming enjoied a similar position
but with considerably less influence during WWII].
Now you see why uncle Sam is so nervous about Simon and Myself...
There is a good book about all this "For the President's Eyes Only".
Phill
NODE 750672fbRe: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!)
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13:42:08 +0800
jim bell writes:
> Maybe this is common knowledge, but the name "Zimmermann" and crypto had
> another relationship, in World War I. If anybody knows more about this
> incident than my vague recollection of the famous "Zimmermann cipher" would
> you care to tell the story?
It was the Zimmermann Telegram, actually, and it was a dispatch from
the Germans to the Mexicans trying to promise them most of the
southwest in exchange for being allies against the U.S. (which wasn't
yet in the war). The Brits intercepted and decoded it and released it,
which forced the U.S. into World War I.
Perry
NODE 1f84342eZimmermann Telegram (crypto history)
cjl <cjl@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>Thu, 25 Jan 1996 00:27:16 +0800
On Tue, 23 Jan 1996, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
> It was the Zimmermann Telegram, actually, and it was a dispatch from
> the Germans to the Mexicans trying to promise them most of the
> southwest in exchange for being allies against the U.S. (which wasn't
> yet in the war). The Brits intercepted and decoded it and released it,
> which forced the U.S. into World War I.
>
Why is it that I seem to recall that one of the responses by a govt.
official to the intercept was the infamous diplomatic quote
"Gentlemen do not read other gentlemen's mail"
Ah, would that this sentiment were more common in government circles
today (sigh) . . . .
C. J. Leonard ( / "DNA is groovy"
\ / - Watson & Crick
<cjl@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu> / \ <-- major groove
( \
Finger for public key \ )
Strong-arm for secret key / <-- minor groove
Thumb-screws for pass-phrase / )
NODE 9bbb3c62Re: Zimmermann Telegram (crypto history)
hallam@w3.orgFri, 26 Jan 1996 05:03:16 +0800
>"Gentlemen do not read other gentlemen's mail"
Bzzt. This was said in the Thirties by the twit who closed down the Black
Chamber.
The quote on the Z. telegram was "Why not give them Califonia as well".
Phill
NODE e17e213eRe: Zimmermann Telegram (crypto history)
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>Thu, 25 Jan 1996 01:18:30 +0800
cjl writes:
> Why is it that I seem to recall that one of the responses by a govt.
> official to the intercept was the infamous diplomatic quote
>
> "Gentlemen do not read other gentlemen's mail"
It wasn't. That was in response to the entire Yardley "Black Chamber"
incident.
.pm
NODE d427f31aRe: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!)
Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>Wed, 24 Jan 1996 23:55:19 +0800
If I recall correctly, the Zimmermann Telegram did NOT bring the US into
the war. It was however one of the many things that lead to a US decision
to enter the war. In itself it did not cause the US entry.
Just my $0.02
Tim Philp
===================================
For PGP Public Key, Send E-mail to:
pgp-public-keys@swissnet.ai.mit.edu
In Subject line type:
GET PHILP
===================================
On Tue, 23 Jan 1996, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
> jim bell writes:
> > Maybe this is common knowledge, but the name "Zimmermann" and crypto had
> > another relationship, in World War I. If anybody knows more about this
> > incident than my vague recollection of the famous "Zimmermann cipher" would
> > you care to tell the story?
>
> It was the Zimmermann Telegram, actually, and it was a dispatch from
> the Germans to the Mexicans trying to promise them most of the
> southwest in exchange for being allies against the U.S. (which wasn't
> yet in the war). The Brits intercepted and decoded it and released it,
> which forced the U.S. into World War I.
>
> Perry
>