2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child
At 03:25 PM 2/19/96 -0500, Dave Mandl wrote: > >I know that there's no sure-fire way to find signatures that aren't >prefixed by, say "--", but that's better than nothing. A fix along the lines of :: don't-send-anything-after-this might be readily applicable. -- Bruce Baugh bruce@aracnet.com http://www.aracnet.com/~bruce
Bruce Baugh wrote: > A fix along the lines of > > :: > don't-send-anything-after-this > > might be readily applicable. This is simply the "cut" feature of remailers, which is already implemented. In response to your question about preserving subject headers, there are actually three different behaviors. The default is to preserve the subject header if the input message is not encrypted, otherwise to discard it. The other two behaviors (nsub and ksub) are to preserve or discard the subject header, respectively. I do not recommend nsub, because it is allows tracing a message through the subject header. No currently operational remailers have nsub behavior. In response to your question about remailers which haven't responded to your tests, remail@c2.org is quite functional. I have no idea why it did not respond. The other remailers are no longer functional. In general, when I take a remailer off the page, it is because it has been non-functional a few weeks, when the remailer operator announces that it will be taken offline, or (temporarily) when I know that the remailer will be unavailable or unreliable for a while. There may be publicly known functioning remailers which are not on my list, but I rather tend to doubt it. In general, I applaud independent work confirming or confronting my remailer-list, but I ask that you please RTFM before doing things like suggesting new features. ObNoise: do any of our resident lawyers have any idea whether "RTFM" is indecent? Raph