NODE 298b67d9Risks of a style anonymizer?
Deranged Mutant <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>Sun, 18 Feb 1996 07:55:50 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
One risk of "style anonymizers", though: if the style becomes too generic
it's just another levelling of readability. Usenet and mailing lists can
become that much more boring, if not stupidified with too many spelling
erros and grammatical abuses.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMSZfQyoZzwIn1bdtAQF47QGAkP5+ti0j6KyJg8KY1ei1dF9Yz8FAnz4b
EjB4r6nMXDW2wBG7ZnpFkX1YO6Aezmte
=vrAk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE 08622767Re: Risks of a style anonymizer?
Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>Mon, 19 Feb 1996 15:06:20 +0800
When did it become the style to have a clause, a colon, and another
clause as the title of things? This seems to be universal in govt and
university and highbrow blue-paper reports nowadays!
<<Perry Metzger off-topic complaint included by reference>>
Alan Horowitz
alanh@norfolk.infi.net