[noise] Re: Crippled Notes export encryption

At 08:24 PM 1/24/96 -0500, you wrote:
>In article <9601242357.AA02688@alpha>, Mike McNally <m5@dev.tivoli.com> wrote:
>>This sounds fishy to me.  I don't recall reading anything to suggest
>>that export of cryptographic software (or any other munition) requires
>>that the stuff be *used* outside the US for an offense to be
>>committed; why should export of a cryptographer's wetware be any
>>different?  Either the expertise leaves the country or it doesn't, I'd
>>think.
>
>Here's section 120.17 of ITAR:
>
>@ 120.17 -- Export.
>
>   Export means:
>
>   (6) A launch vehicle or payload shall not, by reason of the launching of
such
>vehicle, be considered an export for purposes of this subchapter. However, for
>certain limited purposes (see @ 126.1 of this subchapter), the controls of this
>subchapter may apply to any sale, transfer or proposal to sell or transfer
>defense articles or defense services.

So we could launch Jeff Wienstien in a rocket without violating ITAR as long
as we do not sell him.

"Hey Jeff... Want a ride?" ];>

Alan Olsen -- alano@teleport.com -- Contract Web Design & Instruction
        `finger -l alano@teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key 
              http://www.teleport.com/~alano/ 
               National Security uber alles!

Hello

Alan Olsen wrote:

...
> So we could launch Jeff Wienstien in a rocket without violating ITAR as long
> as we do not sell him.

Forget about Jeff, how about PGP? Put it on a rocket (I'm *sure* there's
an amateur rocket club conveniently located near the border), and off
you go! (I guess you'd want to check @ 126.1 first, though).

Have I missed anything?


Jiri
--
If you want an answer, please mail to <jirib@cs.monash.edu.au>.
On sweeney, I may delete without reading!
PGP 463A14D5 (but it's at home so it'll take a day or two)
PGP EF0607F9 (but it's at uni so don't rely on it too much)