Remailers not heard from; info?

I'm curious if anyone knows anything about the status of the following type
I remailers.

NOT HEARD FROM IN MY JANUARY OR FEBRUARY TESTS

amnesia@chardos.connix.com

NOT HEARD FROM IN MY FEBRUARY TESTS

pamphlet@idiom.com
remail@c2.org
remailer@bi-node.zerberus.de
robo@c2.org

And as long as I'm asking questions :-), I see that some remailers
(hfinney@shell.portal.com, hal@alumni.caltech.edu, homer@rahul.net) preserve
subject lines while others do not. Is this a readily settable option? If so,
I'd like to commend it to other remailer operators. If not, I'd be
interested in getting some sense of how difficult a hack it is.


-- 
Bruce Baugh
bruce@aracnet.com
http://www.aracnet.com/~bruce

Bruce Baugh writes:
> And as long as I'm asking questions :-), I see that some remailers
> (hfinney@shell.portal.com, hal@alumni.caltech.edu, homer@rahul.net) preserve
> subject lines while others do not. Is this a readily settable option? If so,
> I'd like to commend it to other remailer operators. If not, I'd be
> interested in getting some sense of how difficult a hack it is.

(Raph has authoritatively covered the space of deployed options already.)

Writing code to keep or drop particular headers is trivial. Getting everyone
who runs a remailer to deploy that code tends to be much harder.

-Lewis	"You're always disappointed, nothing seems to keep you high -- drive 
	your bargains, push your papers, win your medals, fuck your strangers;
	don't it leave you on the empty side ?"  (Joni Mitchell, 1972)