NODE 8b70f37dForgery
david@sternlight.com (David Sternlight)Sat, 10 Feb 1996 03:23:29 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I just sent you a message, forwarding a forged message attributed to me about
plonking. It strikes me that to reduce the possibility that some might
claim THAT message was a forgery, I might have signed it. Too late. Well,
I'll sign this one.
Best;
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: MacPGPv262
iQCVAwUBMRuVP0wgH+NYrQ81AQHXAQP+NYB6xyO24vDDJORyp1PhN9ax0oorgkQu
lCUKZ/G5lrCUnrDMTksy4RqA3N1401QKQGAGWmwlVESWNrMoUP1kjFX8orKZej+/
MHefCtRuh4FB6VmAWeC769Mhza0m02Fu7//R+o95em60wUk0z0O0f5KUe85V3T3T
aRV47lmDQjg=
=w/Nv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE 2c3e86e8Re: Forgery
Fred <admin@dcwill.com>Sat, 10 Feb 1996 04:21:09 +0800
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> I just sent you a message, forwarding a forged message attributed to me about
> plonking. It strikes me that to reduce the possibility that some might
> claim THAT message was a forgery, I might have signed it. Too late. Well,
> I'll sign this one.
Well, the fact that it's a "bad signature" does a lot to assuage concerns
about forgery.
Now we'll probably see another message attempting to validate this one,
which attempted to validate an earlier message about a forgery that no
one (with the possible exception of the author) cared about in the first
place.
David (or whoever is forging this stuff for you), you should have quit
while you were ahead. It's been all downhill for you since the first
message.
Will the real David Sternlight (and DS wanna-bees) please sit down?
Fred <admin@dcwill.com>