NODE a99dedbeRe: Internet shutdown Feb 29?
jis@mit.edu (Jeffrey I. Schiller)Mon, 26 Feb 1996 05:52:22 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>This looks completely, totally, and insanely bogus, but I
>need some kind of verification for this bizarre little
>piece of mail that somehow ended up in my mailbox.
>
>Anybody from MIT ever heard of "Kim Dereksen"?
Yeah, from several of ISP's and others (including one un-named government
organization that wanted to FAX us the message, for security reasons,
didn't want to send it over the network).
Of course the message is Bogus... it wasn't even e-mailed from MIT (nor did
the author try to make it look so).
-Jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMTDOksUtR20Nv5BtAQEoUwP/QYtgsYDnzjv/usaBax+pXX3glYLpewMO
Fi/cQN5840YigQpA/3klyptyEtA9sj2Vd3CYvGfj0KYqZfRG1mSKecURRBHE7kzq
hB2o4fter8Pjp+3bW3APb6DsrCvlkmYcnR+QYBN8oikKkv1+cGYvHl7w6x3LJiiU
U5BLXiPc2s0=
=98q4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE b79b1a22Re: Internet shutdown Feb 29?
Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>Mon, 26 Feb 1996 09:07:49 +0800
On Sun, 25 Feb 1996, Jeffrey I. Schiller wrote:
>
> Yeah, from several of ISP's and others (including one un-named government
> organization that wanted to FAX us the message, for security reasons,
> didn't want to send it over the network).
>
As a matter of interest, I wonder how much of the internet could be
shut down by concerted effort; obviously individual services can be
trivially disabled by jamming listen queues (not really stoppable by
anything short of IPSEC w/photuris). The BGP backbone could probably be
disabled from within by a traitor planted in one of big companies, and a
confused backhoe around the MAEs could probably do a lot more damage than
people would like to admit. It seems that the internet is getting pretty
brittle- I wonder if it would be worthwhile having some sort of infranet
with a bunch of backups links using dial-up lines or spare transponders
(with a filter to block port 80 :-)
It's probably not possible with todays routing technology
(slow, flappy links with nightmarish convergence times), plus it's not
sexy like a nice OC-12 SONET. This is the sort of thing the NCSC should
be working on- something to keep the essential services flowing in the
early stages of an info-war, or an info truck-bomb
---
They say in online country So which side are you on boys
There is no middle way Which side are you on
You'll either be a Usenet man Which side are you on boys
Or a thug for the CDA Which side are you on?
National Union of Computer Operatives; Hackers, local 37 APL-CPIO