NODE ac351306A Sign of the Future
"James M. Cobb" <jcobb@ahcbsd1.ovnet.com>Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:14:44 +0800
Friend,
A 02 04 96 Reuter Information Service newsstory
-----------------------------------------------
GERMANS' INTERNET CRACKDOWN A SIGN OF THE FUTURE
datelined BONN, Germany
reports:
...growing alarm among governments at the uglier side of the
worldwide computer network.
What is this "uglier side"?
German Research and Technology Minister Juergen Ruettgers shouts:
"We cannot tolerate a situation in which anything goes."
THAT
intolerance
is the U*G*L*I*E*S*T side of the 'Net.
Last week Ruettgers declared
...that Bonn respected free speech but must also do more to
regulate the Internet....
When it comes to wiping out free speech
--A*N*Y*T*H*I*N*G goes!
The prosecutors have even
...contacted the Deutsche Forschungsnetz, the national scien-
tific research network.
Following orders from the superpower, its puppet "nation states"
are wrecking the genuine Internet.
Nicholas Negroponte, director of MIT's Media Lab, popped up in
Bonn last week to put a high gloss on the "situation":
"The Internet cannot be regulated. It's not that laws aren't
relevant, it's that the nation state is not relevant.
[ DECEPTION IS VIOLENCE ]
This is the next discussion we will have.
[ If the superpower permits! ]
Cyberlaw is by its nature global and
[ You had better sit down... ]
we're not very good at global law."
Nick's a big shot at Wired magazine. So it should be no surprise
to learn that Wired attacked cypherpunks in its 01 96 issue. In
a fake interview with "Wired's patron saint," Marshall McLuhan is
made to say (p 130):
Concerns about privacy and anonymity are outdated. Cypherpunks
think they are rebels with a cause, but they are really senti-
mentalists.
The era of politics based on private identities, anonymous indi-
viduals, and independent citizens began with the French Revolution
and Napoleon's armies...and ended with Hitler.... The cypherpunks
are still marching to the same martial music.
Please note HOW Wired equates liberty, equality, fraternity with
capitalistic fascism, as David Kahn calls it. Equating the two in
that manner is the same as rejecting the former while embracing the
latter. Further: ending one sentence with "Hitler" while ending the
very next sentence with "the same [Nazi rally] martial music" tends
to identify Nazis and cypherpunks. (Of course those few cypherpunks
who fancy themselves an "elite" SERVE the wolves at Wired.)
Deception is violence: it accustoms people to being violated.
Cordially,
Jim
NOTE. "...in the 1930s...capitalistic fascism did not inspire the
dread among many establishment figures that communism did." --David
Kahn. Kahn on Codes: Secrets of the New Cryptology. Macmillan Pub-
lishing Co. 1983. Page 277.
The Nando News online filename of the newsstory is:
info5_28474.html
Gary Wolf wrote "Channeling McLuhan. The Wired Interview with Wired's
patron saint." He is executive editor of HotWired.
This critical essay was composed 02 04 96.
NODE 941e321cRe: A Sign of the Future
Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>Tue, 6 Feb 1996 07:57:34 +0800
> Concerns about privacy and anonymity are outdated. Cypherpunks
> think they are rebels with a cause, but they are really senti-
> mentalists.
I'm not much for big conspiracy theories, but I like the little ones.
If this was really in Wired, do you think it was written before or after
Tim dissed that magazine here?
NODE a07bb060Re: A Sign of the Future
Steven Levy <steven@echonyc.com>Tue, 6 Feb 1996 00:39:51 +0800
Give me a break. I do not work for Wired but I write for them at times,
and most often my subject is crypto related. I can tell you for a fact
that there is no anti-cypherpunk policy there. I have a long article that
deals in part with cypherpunk-related cryptanlysis in the March issue and
I was, as is always the case, left to make my own editorial judgement.
On Mon, 5 Feb 1996, Alex Strasheim wrote:
> > Concerns about privacy and anonymity are outdated. Cypherpunks
> > think they are rebels with a cause, but they are really senti-
> > mentalists.
>
> I'm not much for big conspiracy theories, but I like the little ones.
>
> If this was really in Wired, do you think it was written before or after
> Tim dissed that magazine here?
>
>
>
NODE d6f969f5Re: A Sign of the Future
sameer <sameer@c2.org>Tue, 6 Feb 1996 02:59:05 +0800
Everyone disses that magazine here. Don't be paranoid.
>
> > Concerns about privacy and anonymity are outdated. Cypherpunks
> > think they are rebels with a cause, but they are really senti-
> > mentalists.
>
> I'm not much for big conspiracy theories, but I like the little ones.
>
> If this was really in Wired, do you think it was written before or after
> Tim dissed that magazine here?
>
>
--
Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-601-9777x3
Community ConneXion, Inc. FAX: 510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376
http://www.c2.org/ (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.org