// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: Some thoughts on the Chinese Net

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE fe0ee322Re: Some thoughts on the Chinese Net
>The more complex portion (from my perspective, at any rate) is a
>modification of the standard TCP/IP protocol, requiring that each packet
>be signed by its originating user.

That's the killer.  Signatures take a huge amount of CPU time.  Signing
each packet is not going to be cost effective.

However, they could have an authenticated key exchange and then symmetric-
encrypt each TCP/IP connection.  That can perform -- and has the nice
side effect [from the Chinese POV] of depriving the NSA of Chinese civilian
net intelligence.  As long as the key exchange is signed, everything
travelling using that key is authenticated implicitly.

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl M. Ellison          cme@cybercash.com   http://www.clark.net/pub/cme |
|CyberCash, Inc., Suite 430                   http://www.cybercash.com/    |
|2100 Reston Parkway           PGP 2.6.2: 61E2DE7FCB9D7984E9C8048BA63221A2 |
|Reston, VA 22091      Tel: (703) 620-4200                                 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
NODE 5deabc97Re: Some thoughts on the Chinese Net
On Thu, 15 Feb 1996, Carl Ellison wrote:

> >The more complex portion (from my perspective, at any rate) is a
> >modification of the standard TCP/IP protocol, requiring that each packet
> >be signed by its originating user.
> 
> That's the killer.  Signatures take a huge amount of CPU time.  Signing
> each packet is not going to be cost effective.

Yep; this has been pointed out to me already. On this point I concur. 

> However, they could have an authenticated key exchange and then symmetric-
> encrypt each TCP/IP connection.  That can perform -- and has the nice
> side effect [from the Chinese POV] of depriving the NSA of Chinese civilian
> net intelligence.  As long as the key exchange is signed, everything
> travelling using that key is authenticated implicitly.

How would packets coming into the country be marked / passed on?

So it seems that, in general, the Chinese supression of the net is 
possible. A frightening thought. Or, if you think about potential 
implications 10 yrs down the road here, a sobering thought.

Jon
----------
Jon Lasser (410)494-3072                         - Obscenity  is a crutch  for
jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu                            inarticulate motherfuckers.
http://www.goucher.edu/~jlasser/
Finger for PGP key (1024/EC001E4D)               - Fuck the CDA.