NODE 263521f8FCC v. Internet Phone?
Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>Sat, 9 Mar 1996 14:47:44 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I've done a scan of the NYT web site (www.nytimes.com) and the AP
and Reuters... no mention of this at all, though there's a new blurb
about another company promopting an Internet Phone type technology.
- --Rob
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMUDxiSoZzwIn1bdtAQFduAGArzYvmvL26xUQiag6etkyg/ysh8RUhTqX
s19MCcxWng+3T3frKu5P8eRju2XYBoF5
=Du5Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE d5bf5abeRe: FCC v. Internet Phone?
"Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>Sat, 9 Mar 1996 18:52:15 +0800
Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 8-Mar-96 FCC v. Internet Phone? by
Mutant Rob@unix.asb.com
> I've done a scan of the NYT web site (www.nytimes.com) and the AP
> and Reuters... no mention of this at all, though there's a new blurb
> about another company promopting an Internet Phone type technology.
I was contacted by a reporter from the Boston Globe who plans to write
about it. Some net-publications have picked or soon will pick it up, I
believe.
-Declan