Councilman/Usenet porn case...

What's most interesting about this is that whoever forged the email 
headers forged anon.penet.fi in there...

Other than that, I'm not sure what the point is.... but that caught my eye.
Jon Lasser
----------
Jon Lasser (410)494-3072                         - Obscenity  is a crutch  for
jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu                            inarticulate motherfuckers.
http://www.goucher.edu/~jlasser/
Finger for PGP key (1024/EC001E4D)               - Fuck the CDA.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 12:16:01 -0500
From: Bruce Zambini <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
To: jlasser@goucher.edu
Subject: web.html


   
   
   TIME Magazine
   
   April 1, 1996 Volume 147, No. 14
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   Return to Contents page
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
WAY WRONG NUMBER

  HELL HATH NO FURY LIKE A CITY COUNCILMAN PORNED
  
   
   
   JOSHUA QUITTNER 
   
   This is a tale about how an online prank grows into an international
   incident. It also goes a long way toward explaining the fear many
   non-Internet people have about this out-of-control thing called
   cyberspace.
   
   Our story begins on the banks of Lake Erie, in Willowick, Ohio (pop.
   15,469). It is the last Monday night in January, about 9 o'clock. City
   councilman Frank Suponcic is home with his wife Linda when the phone
   rings. Linda answers. "Hi, this is Mike," says the man at the other
   end, politely enough. Linda chats with Mike, figuring he must be a
   constituent. (As Willowick's longest-serving ward councilman, Suponcic
   has lots of voters calling him at home.) After a while, Mike asks for
   Annette. Linda tells him he has the wrong number. Mike apologizes and
   hangs up.
   
   The phone rings again at 11:30 p.m. And again. And again. Wrong
   numbers until 4:30 a.m. A weary Suponcic wonders what's up and checks
   the Caller-ID logs on his phone. The first call was from British
   Columbia. The next was from Connecticut. There was one from
   Indianapolis and a few from California. Clearly these are not
   constituents. But who are they?
   
   Suponcic calls the Canadian back--it is now 5:30 a.m. in that time
   zone, and he is only too happy to wake the dude up--and he demands to
   know what is going on. The guy explains, vaguely, that he was merely
   answering an "ad on the Internet. You know, the one about horny
   housewives..."
   
   So now we have a problem. Suponcic, like a lot of people, has a new
   computer. But like most people, he hardly knows what the Internet is.
   Now, somewhere there's an ad on it. For horny housewives. With his
   home phone number.
   
   That night, when the next wrong number came in, Suponcic interrogated
   the caller and learned that the councilman's phone number was printed
   at the bottom of some pictures of naked women that had been posted to
   a Usenet newsgroup called alt.binaries.pictures.erotica, which,
   naturally, Suponcic had never heard of. But he had a friend in
   Cleveland who was something of a computer buff. So the next day the
   two of them jacked into Usenet and spent three hours sifting through
   about 7,400 files on alt. binaries.etc.
   
   Eventually, they found two with Suponcic's phone number. One featured
   a topless brunet wearing only a string of pearls and offering phone
   calls for "as low as 87 [cents] per minute." The other showed a blond
   woman advertising "hot amateur wives ready for you from there [sic]
   own bed." Yikes.
   
   Over the next week, Suponcic received more than 75 calls a day from
   lusty Netizens. "You just could not make phone calls," says the
   exasperated councilman. "And when you went to bed, you had to take
   your phone off the hook."
   
   It was the sorcerer's apprentice scenario, and there was no way to
   stop it.
   
   Suponcic, being a public official, knew his way around the local
   police department, and soon a detective started pounding the Net. By
   tracing the header information on the Usenet postings, the detective
   determined--O.K., this part is murky, we admit--that the messages had
   originated in Ohio, passed through Florida Online, an Internet
   provider in the Sunshine State, and then through anon.penet.fi, a free
   E-mail remailer service based in Finland that allows Internet users to
   post messages anonymously.
   
   The identity of the poster was, and is, unknown, though Suponcic has
   his suspicions. "It's my personal belief that the root of this is
   political," says the councilman, who had to get an unlisted telephone
   number and whose wife now wants to move.
   
   On Feb. 6, at Suponcic's urging, the Willowick city council passed a
   resolution asking the state and federal governments to close the
   "loopholes" that allowed anonymous remailers to operate outside the
   authority of U.S. law-enforcement officials. "Once you've achieved one
   of these anonymous identities, you're dangerous, and there's no way
   law enforcement can track it," Suponcic says. "The animal's out of
   control."
   
   Still not content, Suponcic contacted Steven LaTourette, the U.S.
   Congressman who represents his district. LaTourette's staff suspects
   that the problem lies with Julf Helsingius, the Finn who runs the
   anonymous remailer. They wrote a letter to the Finnish ambassador and
   sent copies to the Secretary of State and the chairman of the House
   Committee on International Relations. The State Department agreed last
   week to look into the complaint.
   
   But here's a reality check. The Finnish remailer could not have been
   used, since anon.penet.fi no longer transmits binary image files.
   Jerry Russell, who runs Florida Online and who looked into the case,
   says he figures the whole thing was a relatively simple prank called a
   sendmail spoof, in which the prankster posts a message with a phony
   return address. He says the Willowick police never produced a copy of
   the posting for him so that he could unravel the tangle for them.
   Indeed, when the policeman called, "he didn't really understand what
   he was trying to tell me," says Russell. "The average Joe Blow police
   detective doesn't know flip about the Internet."
   
   Neither does the average public official. And that, friends, is why
   stuff like the Communications Decency Act--the Christian Coalition's
   attempt to remove pornography from the Internet--sails through
   Congress.
   
   --With reporting by Noah Robischon/New York
   
     _________________________________________________________________
   
   
   [IMAGE] 
   
   Text Only

Here is an example of what anonymous remailers can 
do.......
> 
> 
> 
>    TIME Magazine
> 
>    April 1, 1996 Volume 147, No. 14
>      _________________________________________________________________
> 
>    Return to Contents page
>      _________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> WAY WRONG NUMBER
> 
>   HELL HATH NO FURY LIKE A CITY COUNCILMAN PORNED
> 
> 
> 
>    JOSHUA QUITTNER
> 
>    This is a tale about how an online prank grows into an international
>    incident. It also goes a long way toward explaining the fear many
>    non-Internet people have about this out-of-control thing called
>    cyberspace.
> 
>    Our story begins on the banks of Lake Erie, in Willowick, Ohio (pop.
>    15,469). It is the last Monday night in January, about 9 o'clock. City
>    councilman Frank Suponcic is home with his wife Linda when the phone
>    rings. Linda answers. "Hi, this is Mike," says the man at the other
>    end, politely enough. Linda chats with Mike, figuring he must be a
>    constituent. (As Willowick's longest-serving ward councilman, Suponcic
>    has lots of voters calling him at home.) After a while, Mike asks for
>    Annette. Linda tells him he has the wrong number. Mike apologizes and
>    hangs up.
> 
>    The phone rings again at 11:30 p.m. And again. And again. Wrong
>    numbers until 4:30 a.m. A weary Suponcic wonders what's up and checks
>    the Caller-ID logs on his phone. The first call was from British
>    Columbia. The next was from Connecticut. There was one from
>    Indianapolis and a few from California. Clearly these are not
>    constituents. But who are they?
> 
>    Suponcic calls the Canadian back--it is now 5:30 a.m. in that time
>    zone, and he is only too happy to wake the dude up--and he demands to
>    know what is going on. The guy explains, vaguely, that he was merely
>    answering an "ad on the Internet. You know, the one about horny
>    housewives..."
> 
>    So now we have a problem. Suponcic, like a lot of people, has a new
>    computer. But like most people, he hardly knows what the Internet is.
>    Now, somewhere there's an ad on it. For horny housewives. With his
>    home phone number.
> 
>    That night, when the next wrong number came in, Suponcic interrogated
>    the caller and learned that the councilman's phone number was printed
>    at the bottom of some pictures of naked women that had been posted to
>    a Usenet newsgroup called alt.binaries.pictures.erotica, which,
>    naturally, Suponcic had never heard of. But he had a friend in
>    Cleveland who was something of a computer buff. So the next day the
>    two of them jacked into Usenet and spent three hours sifting through
>    about 7,400 files on alt. binaries.etc.
> 
>    Eventually, they found two with Suponcic's phone number. One featured
>    a topless brunet wearing only a string of pearls and offering phone
>    calls for "as low as 87 [cents] per minute." The other showed a blond
>    woman advertising "hot amateur wives ready for you from there [sic]
>    own bed." Yikes.
> 
>    Over the next week, Suponcic received more than 75 calls a day from
>    lusty Netizens. "You just could not make phone calls," says the
>    exasperated councilman. "And when you went to bed, you had to take
>    your phone off the hook."
> 
>    It was the sorcerer's apprentice scenario, and there was no way to
>    stop it.
> 
>    Suponcic, being a public official, knew his way around the local
>    police department, and soon a detective started pounding the Net. By
>    tracing the header information on the Usenet postings, the detective
>    determined--O.K., this part is murky, we admit--that the messages had
>    originated in Ohio, passed through Florida Online, an Internet
>    provider in the Sunshine State, and then through anon.penet.fi, a free
>    E-mail remailer service based in Finland that allows Internet users to
>    post messages anonymously.
> 
>    The identity of the poster was, and is, unknown, though Suponcic has
>    his suspicions. "It's my personal belief that the root of this is
>    political," says the councilman, who had to get an unlisted telephone
>    number and whose wife now wants to move.
> 
>    On Feb. 6, at Suponcic's urging, the Willowick city council passed a
>    resolution asking the state and federal governments to close the
>    "loopholes" that allowed anonymous remailers to operate outside the
>    authority of U.S. law-enforcement officials. "Once you've achieved one
>    of these anonymous identities, you're dangerous, and there's no way
>    law enforcement can track it," Suponcic says. "The animal's out of
>    control."
> 
>    Still not content, Suponcic contacted Steven LaTourette, the U.S.
>    Congressman who represents his district. LaTourette's staff suspects
>    that the problem lies with Julf Helsingius, the Finn who runs the
>    anonymous remailer. They wrote a letter to the Finnish ambassador and
>    sent copies to the Secretary of State and the chairman of the House
>    Committee on International Relations. The State Department agreed last
>    week to look into the complaint.
> 
>    But here's a reality check. The Finnish remailer could not have been
>    used, since anon.penet.fi no longer transmits binary image files.
>    Jerry Russell, who runs Florida Online and who looked into the case,
>    says he figures the whole thing was a relatively simple prank called a
>    sendmail spoof, in which the prankster posts a message with a phony
>    return address. He says the Willowick police never produced a copy of
>    the posting for him so that he could unravel the tangle for them.
>    Indeed, when the policeman called, "he didn't really understand what
>    he was trying to tell me," says Russell. "The average Joe Blow police
>    detective doesn't know flip about the Internet."
> 
>    Neither does the average public official. And that, friends, is why
>    stuff like the Communications Decency Act--the Christian Coalition's
>    attempt to remove pornography from the Internet--sails through
>    Congress.
> 
>    --With reporting by Noah Robischon/New York
> 
>      _________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
>    [IMAGE]
> 
>    Text Only

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|Vincent S. Gunville     
|Robbins-Gioia		 
|209 Madison St                       Email  vingun@rgalex.com
|Alexandria, Va 22314    
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

On Thu, 28 Mar 1996, Vincent S. Gunville wrote:

> Here is an example of what anonymous remailers can 
> do.......

I'm re-forwarding you the second half of this article, because it seems 
clear that you didn't read the whole thing the first time.

> >    Suponcic, being a public official, knew his way around the local
> >    police department, and soon a detective started pounding the Net. By
> >    tracing the header information on the Usenet postings, the detective
> >    determined--O.K., this part is murky, we admit--that the messages had
> >    originated in Ohio, passed through Florida Online, an Internet
> >    provider in the Sunshine State, and then through anon.penet.fi, a free
> >    E-mail remailer service based in Finland that allows Internet users to
> >    post messages anonymously.
> > 
> >    The identity of the poster was, and is, unknown, though Suponcic has
> >    his suspicions. "It's my personal belief that the root of this is
> >    political," says the councilman, who had to get an unlisted telephone
> >    number and whose wife now wants to move.
> > 
> >    On Feb. 6, at Suponcic's urging, the Willowick city council passed a
> >    resolution asking the state and federal governments to close the
> >    "loopholes" that allowed anonymous remailers to operate outside the
> >    authority of U.S. law-enforcement officials. "Once you've achieved one
> >    of these anonymous identities, you're dangerous, and there's no way
> >    law enforcement can track it," Suponcic says. "The animal's out of
> >    control."
> > 

I know you read at least this far, but keep reading...

> >    Still not content, Suponcic contacted Steven LaTourette, the U.S.
> >    Congressman who represents his district. LaTourette's staff suspects
> >    that the problem lies with Julf Helsingius, the Finn who runs the
> >    anonymous remailer. They wrote a letter to the Finnish ambassador and
> >    sent copies to the Secretary of State and the chairman of the House
> >    Committee on International Relations. The State Department agreed last
> >    week to look into the complaint.
> > 
> >    But here's a reality check. The Finnish remailer could not have been
> >    used, since anon.penet.fi no longer transmits binary image files.
> >    Jerry Russell, who runs Florida Online and who looked into the case,
> >    says he figures the whole thing was a relatively simple prank called a
> >    sendmail spoof, in which the prankster posts a message with a phony
> >    return address. He says the Willowick police never produced a copy of
> >    the posting for him so that he could unravel the tangle for them.
> >    Indeed, when the policeman called, "he didn't really understand what
> >    he was trying to tell me," says Russell. "The average Joe Blow police
> >    detective doesn't know flip about the Internet."
> > 
> >    Neither does the average public official. And that, friends, is why
> >    stuff like the Communications Decency Act--the Christian Coalition's
> >    attempt to remove pornography from the Internet--sails through
> >    Congress.

Allow me to adjust your point to "Here's an example of what sendmail 
exploits can do".

Kathleen M. Ellis     http://zeus.towson.edu/~kelli/     kelli@zeus.towson.edu
Diverse Sexual Orientation Coll.  Towson State University  DSOC@zeus.towson.edu
"I can't help it, I'm a born lever-puller"
							-Ringo
						     from "Yellow Submarine"
"Your friends are really just enemies who don't have the guts to kill you"
       							-J. Tenuta
"Obscenity is a crutch for inarticulate motherfuckers."
							-Fortune Cookie
						Courtesy of Linux 1.3.45

On Thu, 28 Mar 1996, Vincent S. Gunville wrote:

> Here is an example of what anonymous remailers can 
> do.......

[...]

You need to start reading the material you use to support your positons:
Especially this paragraph.

> >    But here's a reality check. The Finnish remailer could not have been
> >    used, since anon.penet.fi no longer transmits binary image files.
> >    Jerry Russell, who runs Florida Online and who looked into the case,
> >    says he figures the whole thing was a relatively simple prank called a
> >    sendmail spoof, in which the prankster posts a message with a phony
> >    return address. He says the Willowick police never produced a copy of
> >    the posting for him so that he could unravel the tangle for them.
> >    Indeed, when the policeman called, "he didn't really understand what
> >    he was trying to tell me," says Russell. "The average Joe Blow police
> >    detective doesn't know flip about the Internet."



> -- 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> |Vincent S. Gunville     
> |Robbins-Gioia		 
> |209 Madison St                       Email  vingun@rgalex.com
> |Alexandria, Va 22314    
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information