// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

3 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE ad4f7f9dRe: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C'punks,

Black Unicorn wrote:

> >I didn't respond to this part originally because I grew tired of typing
> >"Yadda yadda yadda" everytime Mr. Bell lapsed into another
> >psycho-political babble session.

To which Jim Bell wrote:
 
> And the rest of us are tired of seeing those non-responses!

Exactly for whom is Bell speaking?  Jimbo, please let us know 
who has given you a limited powers of attorney to be their
mouthpiece.  It's sad when someone (correctly) deems their
opinions too weak to stand without (dare I say it?) pseudo-
spoofing by reference.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NODE 4e7e8e5fRe: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
Folks;

Just a small meta-request. I already filter everything Jim writes --
its all junk -- but when people reply to a message of his and send the
mail only to Cypherpunks, it is hard for me to filter the reply. If
people could make sure that he's in the To: line, or could make a
practice of putting some standardized phrase (I suggest the words 
"Jim Bell YaddaYadda") into the Subject: line it would make it easier
to filter.

Some people (especially those who don't try to do it) don't actually
understand how hard it is, technically, to heavily filter out the
noise; in the general case the problem is AI complete. Sigh.

Perry

Sandy Sandfort writes:
> To which Jim Bell wrote:
>  
> > And the rest of us are tired of seeing those non-responses!
> 
> Exactly for whom is Bell speaking?  Jimbo, please let us know 
> who has given you a limited powers of attorney to be their
> mouthpiece.
NODE 1cbe856cRe: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:
> Just a small meta-request. I already filter everything Jim writes --
> its all junk -- but when people reply to a message of his and send the
> mail only to Cypherpunks, it is hard for me to filter the reply.

It's a pity most mailers don't preserve 'References:'.
Can you filter out everything that says 'in-reply-to .* pacifier.com>'?

---

Dr. Dimitri Vulis
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps