Re: [NOISE] Re: Nazis on the Net

EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU writes:
| Abraham Lincoln is one reason I _don't_ use the above definition; by mine,
| he'd be a separatist (wanted to move Blacks to Liberia, if I recall correctly).
| I trust that everyone involved in this discussion (with the exception of the
| neo-Nazi) would agree that Abraham Lincoln was better than those in the South
| who wanted to keep blacks enslaved?

Do we have a neo-Nazi in this discussion??  Are you implying that any sceptic
of a few Holocaust `facts' is a neo-Nazi??  Do you infer that all pro-lifers
are Republicans??

It is because of such baseless inferences, I have to remain anonymous.  I would
dearly love to debate under my real name, but am prevented from doing so by the
neo-Nazi name-calling.

Yes you are correct, I disagree that Abraham Lincoln was better than those in
the South, not for racial reasons (remember, the Civil War was *not* about
slavery, because the slavery issue only arised *after* the war started), but
because I believe that a diverse set of countries is `better' than one.  I
believe that countries that want independence (such as Chechnya) should have
it.  (Yes, I am likening Abe Lincoln to Boris Yeltsin).

[ You may also like to consider that blacks as well as whites fought for the
South. ]

---
``The believer is happy. The doubter is wise''.  -  Hungarian proverb

On Thu, 25 Apr 1996, Anonymous wrote:
> It is because of such baseless inferences, I have to remain anonymous.  I would
> dearly love to debate under my real name, but am prevented from doing so by the
> neo-Nazi name-calling.

	No, you aren't. Get a fscking freenet account so we can take this 
to email.

> Yes you are correct, I disagree that Abraham Lincoln was better than those in
> the South, not for racial reasons (remember, the Civil War was *not* about
> slavery, because the slavery issue only arised *after* the war started), but

	No, the war was over states rights and economics. Slavery was one 
of the issues involved in the states rights debates.

On Sat, 27 Apr 1996, Snow wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Apr 1996, The Troll wrote:
> > It is because of such baseless inferences, I have to remain anonymous.  I would
> > dearly love to debate under my real name, but am prevented from doing so by the
> > neo-Nazi name-calling.
> 
>         No, you aren't. Get a fscking freenet account so we can take this
> to email.

Who says he doesn't have one?

This is the most un-PC place you can get. He's just trolling.

For all you wonderful open-minded folks who have made up your mind about
me, please see http://www-leland.stanford.edu/~ajg/ for an ACCURATE
perspective on my character and views that should surprise just about
everybody who has trolled here. 

Please note that ajg has already received dozens of comments, has already
turned in the paper, and is very busy on another. She knows about a few
typos and technical errors, and she knows that she misquoted me once.

-rich