NODE bc373afbGPS privacy/ECM
Brian D Williams <talon57@well.com>Tue, 16 Apr 1996 03:49:16 +0800
I have been following the recent discussion on Denning's GPS I.D.
plan and had some thoughts:
I wonder what the pro-govt anti-privacy types would do if some
obnoxious group started publishing a list with the home/work GPS of
say various congresspersons/senatepersons?
Since cruise missile's already use GPS to find/destroy their
target, how long do you figure before some terrorist group use's
this ever cheaper tech to trigger one of it's devices?
<car bombs, the poor man's air force>
What defences are there? Just how small/inexpensive could a home
GPS/ECM system be?
Personnel dithering? Locally transmitting your own public key
encrypted location.
This is thoughtfood only.
Brian
NODE 82e4f4baRe: GPS privacy/ECM
Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>Tue, 16 Apr 1996 04:50:16 +0800
On Mon, 15 Apr 1996, Brian D Williams wrote:
> What defences are there? Just how small/inexpensive could a home
> GPS/ECM system be?
The portable handheld GPS receivers are well under $300. I've seen a
couple under $200.
Clinton is supposed to have either turned off dithering or will soon
(crossing fingers). Dithering is a real nuisance at times...
--
Ed Carp, N7EKG Ed.Carp@linux.org, ecarp@netcom.com
214/993-3935 voicemail/digital pager
Finger ecarp@netcom.com for PGP 2.5 public key an88744@anon.penet.fi
"Past the wounds of childhood, past the fallen dreams and the broken families,
through the hurt and the loss and the agony only the night ever hears, is a
waiting soul. Patient, permanent, abundant, it opens its infinite heart and
asks only one thing of you ... 'Remember who it is you really are.'"
-- "Losing Your Mind", Karen Alexander and Rick Boyes
The mark of a good conspiracy theory is its untestability.
-- Andrew Spring