NODE 071aedc3GIV_way
John Young <jya@pipeline.com>Wed, 24 Apr 1996 06:16:37 -0700 (PDT)
FiTi reports on a Lisbon money laundering conference:
4-23-96: "Long arm of US law threatens business."
The extra-territorial reach of US law poses a growing
threat to non-US companies doing business, even
indirectly, with that country, an expert on money
laundering said yesterday. Mr Rowan Bosworth-Davies told
a conference in Lisbon that US courts had been
"consistent in concluding that US law enforcement
interests outweigh a foreign nation's interests in
preserving the confidentiality of its banking or its
business records".
4-24-96: "US prosecutor attacks bank secrecy laws."
A US federal prosecutor yesterday told banks that they
are no better than prostitutes if they transmit money
without knowing their customers or the purpose of the
transaction. Mr John Moscow said: "The ancient concept
that bank secrecy must be preserved to keep a
gentleman's financial affairs confidential -- dating
back to the days when only gentlemen had cheque
accounts, and their servants did not -- must give way to
the current reality.
GIV_way
NODE c93ab43aRe: GIV_way
Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, 24 Apr 1996, John Young wrote:
> 4-24-96: "US prosecutor attacks bank secrecy laws."
>
> A US federal prosecutor yesterday told banks that they
> are no better than prostitutes if they transmit money
> without knowing their customers or the purpose of the
> transaction.
I agree with this completely. I'm sure that I disagree with said US
prosecutor on the criminalization of sexual entrepreneurship (tm), though,
so our agreement is meaningless.
-rich