NODE f228bfc5ApacheSSL
"Sean A. Walberg" <umwalber@cc.UManitoba.CA>Sun, 21 Apr 1996 05:38:49 +0800
An ISP that I have ties with is looking to set up a secure server.
Currently, they are running Apache. I told them that for ~$500 they
can put on Apache SSL and be all ready. However, they want to buy
Netscape (for the name, I've already given them the 40bit gospel),
put it on a separate, firewalled machine, allow no access to it, etc,
etc. Is all this paranoia necessary?
Sean
=================] Will work for RAM [==================
| Sean A. Walberg | PGP key | C programmers |
| Computer Engineering ][ | on | do it in |
| umwalber@cc.umanitoba.ca | servers | libraries! |
=============] http://www.escape.ca/~sean [=============
NODE 0768c289Re: ApacheSSL
Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>Mon, 22 Apr 1996 09:46:27 +0800
Sean A. Walberg wrote:
>
> An ISP that I have ties with is looking to set up a secure server.
> Currently, they are running Apache. I told them that for ~$500 they
> can put on Apache SSL and be all ready. However, they want to buy
> Netscape (for the name, I've already given them the 40bit gospel),
> put it on a separate, firewalled machine, allow no access to it, etc,
> etc. Is all this paranoia necessary?
I won't argue about the merits of Apache vs. Netscape servers.
However I will point out that if your ISP friend is in Canada, they
can get the 128-bit version of the Netscape server.
--Jeff
--
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.