NODE 07d7cafaJava Crypto API questions
shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)Fri, 31 May 1996 16:35:27 +0800
Today, CP's own Marianne Mueller was scheduled to give a talk at JavaOne on
the eagerly awaited (at least by this user) Java Crypto API. I could not
attend the conference, but downloaded the slides for the presentation
<http://java.sun.com/javaone/pres/Crypto.pdf>
Viewing the slides left me with some questions that I hope someone that
attended the talk might be able to answer:
o "Developers do not call into Security Packages directly."
It seems the developer calls java.security (presumably provided by Sun),
which then will call the Security Packages. Is this view correct?
o "Security Packages must be signed. Policy for signing is public and open."
I assume the packages must be signed by Sun. How much will it cost to have
a package signed? How do I obtain a copy of this "public and open" policy?
o "Exportable API. Exportable applications."
One code example shows performing a DES encryption. Another slide mentions
"Support for [...] RSA." This is exportable? What am I missing?
o Where can I get more info on "Jeeves", the Java HTTP Server?
TIA,
Disclaimer: My opinions are my own, not those of my employer.
-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
NODE 93a05912Re: Java Crypto API questions
Moltar Ramone <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>Sat, 1 Jun 1996 02:53:48 +0800
On Thu, 30 May 1996, Lucky Green wrote:
> o "Security Packages must be signed. Policy for signing is public and open."
> I assume the packages must be signed by Sun. How much will it cost to have
> a package signed? How do I obtain a copy of this "public and open" policy?
>
> o "Exportable API. Exportable applications."
> One code example shows performing a DES encryption. Another slide mentions
> "Support for [...] RSA." This is exportable? What am I missing?
My guess would be that the first of these two points answers the second.
Everything is exportable -- except signed third-party security packages.
My bet would be that the exportable code would not be more than RC4-40 or
perhaps 1DES, but that a signed package would go to RC4-128, 3DES, and
RSA-1024. However, the signature on that package would be on the
condition that the vendor/distributor of that package follow all export
regulations.
This is the way Micro$oft's CAPI is supposed to work; it's got
commodities jurisdiction approval already, my bet is Sun can get the same.
----------
Jon Lasser (410)532-7138 - Obscenity is a crutch for
jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu inarticulate motherfuckers.
http://www.goucher.edu/~jlasser/
Finger for PGP key (1024/EC001E4D) - Fuck the CDA.