NODE 3334b4cfRe: An alternative to remailer shutdowns
"Rev. Mark Grant, ULC" <mark@unicorn.com>Fri, 24 May 1996 07:53:28 +0800
On Wed, 22 May 1996, Bill Stewart wrote:
> A secondary concern is handling multi-casts - should the remailer
> create one copy for each recipient (secure, easy, space-wasteful),
> or should it try to get fancy and keep the message for N recipients or D days?
Easy on Unix - just create N links to the same file, delete each link as
the recipient requests it, and delete all remaining links after D days.
Mark