NODE b40f4875Re: Clipper III analysis
tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)Thu, 30 May 1996 14:12:14 +0800
At 1:57 AM 5/30/96, jonathon wrote:
....
> It is a specialty within the QDE Field, but there are a few
> QDE's that are _currently_ doing that. << Printed hard copy,
> not electronic copy, but that is the _only_ difference. >>
>
>> I would be very interested to hear how a "Questioned Document Examiner" can
>
> It is at the point where statistics, textual analysis, grammar
> and lingustics converge.
>
>> possibly determine that a digital signature was not applied by a particular
>> person.
>
> I don't remember the minimum number of characters that are needed
> to establish that a document was written by a specific individual.
> Roughly fifteen pages of text that both sides admit as being
> authentic is required for the undisputed exemplars.
Ah, but the issue of who _signs_ a document is fundamentally and
importantly different from the issue of who _wrote_ the document.
If I have allegedly _signed_ a contract, who cares if exhaustive analysis
reveals it to have been _written_ with 77.93% probability by Irving J.
Shlublutz, CPA for State Farm Insurance Compance?
The issue with digital signatures is who _signed_ a document, not who
_wrote_ a document.
--Tim May
Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software!
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
NODE 38a92483Re: Clipper III analysis
jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>Thu, 30 May 1996 19:41:15 +0800
Tim:
On Wed, 29 May 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:
> The issue with digital signatures is who _signed_ a document, not who
> _wrote_ a document.
For legal contracts and electronic cheques, yes.
I was thinking of other uses for digital signatures, where
being able to authenticate who wrote the document is the
issue.
xan
jonathon
grafolog@netcom.com
**********************************************************************
* *
* Opinions expressed don't necessarily reflect my own views. *
* *
* There is no way that they can be construed to represent *
* any organization's views. *
* *
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
* *
* http://members.tripod.com/~graphology/index.html *
* *
***********************************************************************