proposed anti-pseudospoofing law in Georgia

this law got a little notice here although I didn't notice people
considering its identity aspects in particular.

this proposed law in Georgia 
would make it illegal to have a login name other than 
your legal name, as I understand it.

I consider it rather silly, naive, and unenforcable, 
but it does suggest a few things:

1. lawmakers are starting to notice the internet bigtime.
2. its starting to freak them out.
3. the identity issues raised by cyberspace have significant 
social implications and will not go away quietly.
4. there are some legitimate reasons to require ID in some places
in cyberspace.

of course I will be flamed on 4, but my position is, has always
been the following: both anonymous and "identified" communication
have their places. I am not suggesting that either one is superior
a priori.  however each has different uses. some things that
are possible in one are not possible in the other, etc.

I think it is reasonable
for people who create/maintain forums or other cyberspace services
to demand, and be able to enforce, that you use your real 
identity if they choose. likewise, you are free not to join these
place or use these services. I think anyone should be free
to create alternatives that spit in the face of these restrictions.
let the market decide what is most viable in given situations.

I suspect that we are going to see some laws being passed trying
to regulate cyberspace that are really ridiculous. it will take
the lawmakers awhile to figure out what they can and can't get away with
and when their opinions are or are not relevant to what happens.

meanwhile, if the internet really is robust, their irrelevant
posturings should not make much difference, although I am *not* 
advocating that people resign themselves to these laws, only that
if they pass the situation is not necessarily catastrophic or
apocalyptic.


------- Forwarded Message


- ------- Forwarded Message

Date:      Tue, 30 Apr 1996 11:31:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: merkaba@styx.ios.com
Reply-To: snetnews@xbn.shore.net
To: Multiple recipients of list SNETNEWS <SNETNEWS@XBN.SHORE.NET>
Subject:   INTERNET POLICE (fwd)




- - ---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 21:44:53 -0400
From: Ronald Pearce <ronald@cybercomm.net>
To: merkaba@styx.ios.com
Subject: INTERNET POLICE

>
>It is being dubbed the Internet Police Law.  Georgia's state government is
>beginning to catch a little net-heat because of a new law signed by the
>Governor last week which, according to some, CRIMINALIZES the use of e-mail
>addresses which don't properly identify a person, as well as the practice of
>linking to another web page by name without first obtaining permission to
>link.  
>
>If anyone cares to see information and commentary on this new law, feel free
>to browse over to www.kuesterlaw.com.  I would love to know what everyone
>thinks about the constitutionality of this bill, as well as any other comments.
>
>Thanks.
>jk
>Jeffrey R. Kuester, Esq.         Patent, Copyright, & Trademark Law
>6445 Powers Ferry Road, Suite 230, Atlanta, Georgia 30339
>Ph (770) 951-2623  Fax (770) 612-9713
>E-mail: kuester@kuesterlaw.com
>WWW: http://www.KUESTERLAW.com   (The Technology Law Resource)
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------




- - ->   SNETNEWS Mailing List & Fidonet Echo
- - ->   Post to:  listserv@xbn.shore.net    
- - ->             subscribe snetnews        



- ------- End of Forwarded Message


------- End of Forwarded Message

"anti-psuedospoofing".
	He really has given up pretending not to be detweiler.


-- 
Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-601-9777x3
Community ConneXion, Inc.			FAX:     510-601-9734
The Internet Privacy Provider			Dialin:  510-658-6376
http://www.c2.net/ (or login as "guest")		sameer@c2.net

>	"anti-psuedospoofing".

pardon me, I thought that was the correct term. I saw someone
like Hal Finney or TCM (PM? EH?) use it here as I recall. 
it's hard to remember. if there is a more correct term I will
be happy to use that in the future.

Can you please post the text of the bill?

Thank you,

	...

Vladimir Z. Nuri wrote:
> 
> this law got a little notice here although I didn't notice people
> considering its identity aspects in particular.
> 
> this proposed law in Georgia 
> would make it illegal to have a login name other than 
> your legal name, as I understand it.
> 
> I consider it rather silly, naive, and unenforcable, 
> but it does suggest a few things:
> 
> 1. lawmakers are starting to notice the internet bigtime.
> 2. its starting to freak them out.
> 3. the identity issues raised by cyberspace have significant 
> social implications and will not go away quietly.
> 4. there are some legitimate reasons to require ID in some places
> in cyberspace.
> 
> of course I will be flamed on 4, but my position is, has always
> been the following: both anonymous and "identified" communication
> have their places. I am not suggesting that either one is superior
> a priori.  however each has different uses. some things that
> are possible in one are not possible in the other, etc.
> 
> I think it is reasonable
> for people who create/maintain forums or other cyberspace services
> to demand, and be able to enforce, that you use your real 
> identity if they choose. likewise, you are free not to join these
> place or use these services. I think anyone should be free
> to create alternatives that spit in the face of these restrictions.
> let the market decide what is most viable in given situations.
> 
> I suspect that we are going to see some laws being passed trying
> to regulate cyberspace that are really ridiculous. it will take
> the lawmakers awhile to figure out what they can and can't get away with
> and when their opinions are or are not relevant to what happens.
> 
> meanwhile, if the internet really is robust, their irrelevant
> posturings should not make much difference, although I am *not* 
> advocating that people resign themselves to these laws, only that
> if they pass the situation is not necessarily catastrophic or
> apocalyptic.
> 
> 
> ------- Forwarded Message
> 
> 
> - ------- Forwarded Message
> 
> Date:      Tue, 30 Apr 1996 11:31:52 -0400 (EDT)
> From: merkaba@styx.ios.com
> Reply-To: snetnews@xbn.shore.net
> To: Multiple recipients of list SNETNEWS <SNETNEWS@XBN.SHORE.NET>
> Subject:   INTERNET POLICE (fwd)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - - ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 21:44:53 -0400
> From: Ronald Pearce <ronald@cybercomm.net>
> To: merkaba@styx.ios.com
> Subject: INTERNET POLICE
> 
> >
> >It is being dubbed the Internet Police Law.  Georgia's state government is
> >beginning to catch a little net-heat because of a new law signed by the
> >Governor last week which, according to some, CRIMINALIZES the use of e-mail
> >addresses which don't properly identify a person, as well as the practice of
> >linking to another web page by name without first obtaining permission to
> >link.  
> >
> >If anyone cares to see information and commentary on this new law, feel free
> >to browse over to www.kuesterlaw.com.  I would love to know what everyone
> >thinks about the constitutionality of this bill, as well as any other comments.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >jk
> >Jeffrey R. Kuester, Esq.         Patent, Copyright, & Trademark Law
> >6445 Powers Ferry Road, Suite 230, Atlanta, Georgia 30339
> >Ph (770) 951-2623  Fax (770) 612-9713
> >E-mail: kuester@kuesterlaw.com
> >WWW: http://www.KUESTERLAW.com   (The Technology Law Resource)
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - - ->   SNETNEWS Mailing List & Fidonet Echo
> - - ->   Post to:  listserv@xbn.shore.net    
> - - ->             subscribe snetnews        
> 
> 
> 
> - ------- End of Forwarded Message
> 
> 
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
> 
>