NODE 81bd5e7eRe: CryptoAnarchy: What's wrong with this picture?
"E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>Tue, 7 May 1996 10:45:00 +0800
From: IN%"unicorn@schloss.li" "Black Unicorn" 29-APR-1996 02:21:27.65
To: IN%"jimbell@pacifier.com" "jim bell"
CC: IN%"cypherpunks@toad.com" "Cypherpunks"
Subj: RE: CryptoAnarchy: What's wrong with this picture?
Received: from toad.com by mbcl.rutgers.edu (PMDF #12194) id
<01I43INDKHI88WWLV8@mbcl.rutgers.edu>; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 02:18 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA27441 for
cypherpunks-outgoing; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 19:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from polaris.mindport.net (unicorn@polaris.mindport.net
[205.219.167.2]) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA27428 for
<cypherpunks@toad.com>; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 19:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unicorn@localhost) by polaris.mindport.net
(8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA07591; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:15:56 -0400
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Subject: RE: CryptoAnarchy: What's wrong with this picture?
In-reply-to: <m0uDagf-00093GC@pacifier.com>
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Cc: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Reply-to: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960428234342.5923A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
X-Envelope-to: eallensmith
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Posted-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:15:56 -0400
X-Sender: unicorn@polaris.mindport.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
On Sun, 28 Apr 1996, jim bell wrote:
[...]
>While strong cryptography is powerful, and secure communications
>liberating, unplugging the phones would about cripple that 'weapon' for a
>while. Any group rebelling based only on high technology communication is
>an extremely vulnerable group, both to widespread denial of service, and
>more specific 'surgical' attacks. (Motorola stock anyone?)
Wouldn't that partially depend on:
A. the level of backups - packet radio as a backup for phones,
for instance... a reason I've been forwarding the stuff on radio to here.
B. the necessity to the government of keeping what else may
depend on those phones - the economy - going.
-Allen
NODE b96cc168Re: CryptoAnarchy: What's wrong with this picture?
Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>Tue, 7 May 1996 15:36:28 +0800
On Mon, 6 May 1996, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Apr 1996, jim bell wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >While strong cryptography is powerful, and secure communications
> >liberating, unplugging the phones would about cripple that 'weapon' for a
> >while. Any group rebelling based only on high technology communication is
> >an extremely vulnerable group, both to widespread denial of service, and
> >more specific 'surgical' attacks. (Motorola stock anyone?)
Watch your attributation. This is my quote.
>
> Wouldn't that partially depend on:
> A. the level of backups - packet radio as a backup for phones,
> for instance... a reason I've been forwarding the stuff on radio to here.
> B. the necessity to the government of keeping what else may
> depend on those phones - the economy - going.
> -Allen
>
---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com
NODE ab0adef7Re: CryptoAnarchy: What's wrong with this picture?
Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>Tue, 7 May 1996 17:38:57 +0800
>
> On Sun, 28 Apr 1996, jim bell wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >While strong cryptography is powerful, and secure communications
> >liberating, unplugging the phones would about cripple that 'weapon' for a
> >while. Any group rebelling based only on high technology communication is
> >an extremely vulnerable group, both to widespread denial of service, and
> >more specific 'surgical' attacks. (Motorola stock anyone?)
Watch your attributation, this is my quote.
>
> Wouldn't that partially depend on:
> A. the level of backups - packet radio as a backup for phones,
> for instance... a reason I've been forwarding the stuff on radio to here.
> B. the necessity to the government of keeping what else may
> depend on those phones - the economy - going.
> -Allen
>
---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com