NODE d9a5d6a7Re: L. Detweiler is a CyberAngel
Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>Mon, 6 May 1996 14:04:45 +0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
A few days ago, I forwarded along an excerpt from a recent CyberAngels
mailing where they had favorably cited a HUGE FAQ on remailers by one L.
Detweiler.
So far, four different people (or nyms) have asked me for a copy of my
remailer FAQ.
Um...
I believe you can get it at http://www.csn.net/~ldetweil/
- -rich
(the truth is out!)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMY1TpY3DXUbM57SdAQEfgwP/a6gAKZXtsDG/rG5E+y0whaCF7qh51FCM
aa9Hr4w/v085MJ3vHmH9TtLgSvxh1mLHuzBs2X/bNh3cFaiA3qAZ5OgDZPbo/58Z
MCOlSHjPrJ+y7p56KJmUosN2VZKugeiUIvQyRT3c1b2pKcAuJf0dxKUOWCQvoi1Q
SUd3/d7bFR4=
=YXxJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE 25687319Re: L. Detweiler is a CyberAngel
"Mark O. Aldrich" <maldrich@grci.com>Tue, 7 May 1996 04:47:16 +0800
On Sun, 5 May 1996, Rich Graves wrote:
<snip>
>
> I believe you can get it at http://www.csn.net/~ldetweil/
>
Is this stuff collected and published by LD himself, of is someone just
fronting it? The tone of the prose seems a little weird, but I wasn't on
c'punks during his heyday, so I can't tell. It seems a little too
self-effacing at times for the style of a net.loon.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Liberty is truly dead |Mark Aldrich |
| when the slaves are willing |GRCI INFOSEC Engineering |
| to forge their own chains. |maldrich@grci.com |
| STOP THE CDA NOW! |MAldrich@dockmaster.ncsc.mil |
|_______________________________________________________________________|
|The author is PGP Empowered. Public key at: finger maldrich@grci.com |
| The opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the author |
| and my employer gets no credit for them whatsoever. |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
NODE 54aa2140Re: L. Detweiler is a CyberAngel [NOISE]
Jim Gillogly <jim@ACM.ORG>Tue, 7 May 1996 09:52:06 +0800
"Mark O. Aldrich" <maldrich@grci.com> writes:
>Is this stuff collected and published by LD himself, of is someone just
>fronting it? The tone of the prose seems a little weird, but I wasn't on
>c'punks during his heyday, so I can't tell. It seems a little too
>self-effacing at times for the style of a net.loon.
LD isn't a loon, in my opinion. He has a strongly-held but consistent
opinion on matters of computer privacy. His "loon" reputation (and
election, IIRC) stems from back in the days when he was making his points
by performance art and example, rather than by reasoned argumentation and
exposition. People looking at the performance art and taking it at face
value have been confused by the underlying message and annoyed by the
medium -- not everyone appreciates a cyber-Mapplethorpe.
Jim Gillogly
Trewesday, 16 Thrimidge S.R. 1996, 17:09