Re: [SCARE]: "If you only knew what we know..."

At 05:52 PM 5/24/96 -0500, snow <snow@smoke.suba.com> wrote:
>> > Don't suppose Matt could do a little executive summary of 
>> > "The Briefing" and post it to the list, could he?
>> Probably not unless he wanted to do time.
>> I suspect some anonymous person might put bamboo shoots under his
>> fingernails and post the results of the interrogation however.
>
>	Isn't this exactly what the anon remailers were designed for?

It's also what Canary Traps were designed for.
Are the "secrets" they told Matt the same as the ones they told Dorothy?
Not likely....
#					Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com, +1-415-442-2215
# goodtimes signature virus innoculation

On Sat, 25 May 1996, Bill Stewart wrote:
> At 05:52 PM 5/24/96 -0500, snow <snow@smoke.suba.com> wrote:
> >> > Don't suppose Matt could do a little executive summary of 
> >> > "The Briefing" and post it to the list, could he?
> >> Probably not unless he wanted to do time.
> >> I suspect some anonymous person might put bamboo shoots under his
> >> fingernails and post the results of the interrogation however.
> >	Isn't this exactly what the anon remailers were designed for?
> It's also what Canary Traps were designed for.
> Are the "secrets" they told Matt the same as the ones they told Dorothy?
> Not likely....

	Thought about that, just couldn't remember the name of the bird.
If someone was to post a summary, leaving out specific cases, that _might_
get around it. Also, depending on exactly what was in the breifing, one
could "embellish" it a little, give cases _similar_ (i.e. made up) to give
us an idea of what goes on, but not to release specific details. 

Petro, Christopher C.
petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff>
snow@crash.suba.com