NODE f10514abRe: Clipper III analysis
tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)Thu, 30 May 1996 04:57:55 +0800
At 5:54 AM 5/29/96, jonathon wrote:
> A good Questioned Document Examiner will be able to demonstrate
> that the signed document in question was not authored by Joe
> Blow, even if it contains his digital signature.
I was of course talking about digital signatures, not handwritten signatures.
I would be very interested to hear how a "Questioned Document Examiner" can
possibly determine that a digital signature was not applied by a particular
person.
--Tim May
Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software!
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
NODE 503726d5Re: Clipper III analysis
jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>Thu, 30 May 1996 14:15:40 +0800
On Wed, 29 May 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:
> At 5:54 AM 5/29/96, jonathon wrote:
>
> > A good Questioned Document Examiner will be able to demonstrate
> > that the signed document in question was not authored by Joe
> > Blow, even if it contains his digital signature.
>
> I was of course talking about digital signatures, not handwritten signatures.
I was also talking about digital signatures.
It is a specialty within the QDE Field, but there are a few
QDE's that are _currently_ doing that. << Printed hard copy,
not electronic copy, but that is the _only_ difference. >>
> I would be very interested to hear how a "Questioned Document Examiner" can
It is at the point where statistics, textual analysis, grammar
and lingustics converge.
> possibly determine that a digital signature was not applied by a particular
> person.
I don't remember the minimum number of characters that are needed
to establish that a document was written by a specific individual.
Roughly fifteen pages of text that both sides admit as being
authentic is required for the undisputed exemplars.
The actual work is not that difficult, just time consuming.
xan
jonathon
grafolog@netcom.com
**********************************************************************
* *
* Opinions expressed don't necessarily reflect my own views. *
* *
* There is no way that they can be construed to represent *
* any organization's views. *
* *
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
* *
* http://members.tripod.com/~graphology/index.html *
* *
***********************************************************************