Reference Correction Re: Thank you for the Archives 100 messages

Careful Alan; I didn't write that.

That was qut@netcom.com, the latest addition to my killfile,
who replied to my private email on Cypherpunks, and, rather oddly,
called me a Mormon.

Message in question appended.

-j

>> REAL crypto-anarchists,
>
>  Like the folks who brought us Tiannemen Square?
>
>> of course, want the
>> destruction of copyrights, trademarks, and
>> other weapons of capitali$m, and will
>
>
>
>
>
>> Kill your Television
>
>   Threw mine out in 1987. There's more people who don't have indoor
>bathrooms, than don't have a TV. (source: 1990 Bureau of the Census). I'm
>in a pretty elite group.


------------------

Return-Path: <qut>
Received: (from qut@localhost) by netcom13.netcom.com (8.6.13/Netcom)
        id AAA24004; Sat, 8 Jun 1996 00:30:50 -0700
From: qut (Be Good)
Message-Id: <199606080730.AAA24004@netcom13.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Thank you for the Archives 100 messages
To: foodie@netcom.com
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 00:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
Reply-To: foodie@netcom.com
In-Reply-To: <31B91EA0.16F@netcom.com> from "Jamie Lawrence" at Jun 7, 96
10:33:09 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1582

> qut4.qut@netcom.com wrote:
> >
> > Apologies, but rich has deleted me from
> > his mailboxes, and for a few days now,
>
> As I have, too, now.
>
> > somebody has placed a global cancel bot on
> > me.  I'm gonna have plenty of fun figuring
> > this out.  Kwow any good sniffers?
>
> I'm glad! If my processor/filtering software doesn't
> have to deal with your garbage, that's more time I have
> to spend with folks who have something to say.

The only thing your type of "cypherpunk" has
to say, is blather about liability, copyrights,
and other capitali$t bs.

REAL crypto-anarchists, of course, want the
destruction of copyrights, trademarks, and
other weapons of capitali$m, and will
implement crypto-anonymonity to proceed
forthwith.

> No, I don't know of any better "sniffers" (I assume you
> mean, "software that can detect a cancelbot"), as such
> software is impossible to detect. Of course, unless Rich
> (or whomever cares so much about a moron) has either root
> on toad.com, or at least as many resources as the NSA, he
> can't cancel your mail to Cypherpunks (or anywhere else).

I was talking about netnews, mormon.

> > I agree the list should be public usenet:
> > A mail gate-way to a usenet group that
> > ALSO permits unmoderated posts.  This
> > would be a nice way to combine a strict
> > moderated mail-list, with a standard
> > netnews group.
>
> Er, what?
>
> That paragraph makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

There's already hundreds of groups like
that, stupid.  It will be implemented,
whether you like it or not.


--

Kill Your Television



--
The signal is the noise.
____________________________________________________________________
Jamie Lawrence   mailto:jal@cyborganic.net  mailto:foodie@netcom.com

On Sat, 8 Jun 1996, Jamie Lawrence wrote:

> Careful Alan; I didn't write that.
> 
> That was qut@netcom.com, the latest addition to my killfile,
> who replied to my private email on Cypherpunks, and, rather oddly,
> called me a Mormon.

For enlightenment on that point, see Skippy's message "Christ was NOT a
Mormon" in alt.zen and 35 other newsgroups, <qutDrFypn.6Io@netcom.com>,
http://ww2.altavista.digital.com/cgi-bin/news?plain@msg@33480@rec%2emusic%2echristian

-rich