Re: Thank you for the Archives 100 messages

> qut4.qut@netcom.com wrote:
> > 
> > Apologies, but rich has deleted me from
> > his mailboxes, and for a few days now,
> 
> As I have, too, now.
> 
> > somebody has placed a global cancel bot on
> > me.  I'm gonna have plenty of fun figuring
> > this out.  Kwow any good sniffers?
> 
> I'm glad! If my processor/filtering software doesn't
> have to deal with your garbage, that's more time I have
> to spend with folks who have something to say.

The only thing your type of "cypherpunk" has
to say, is blather about liability, copyrights,
and other capitali$t bs.

REAL crypto-anarchists, of course, want the 
destruction of copyrights, trademarks, and
other weapons of capitali$m, and will
implement crypto-anonymonity to proceed
forthwith.

> No, I don't know of any better "sniffers" (I assume you
> mean, "software that can detect a cancelbot"), as such
> software is impossible to detect. Of course, unless Rich
> (or whomever cares so much about a moron) has either root
> on toad.com, or at least as many resources as the NSA, he
> can't cancel your mail to Cypherpunks (or anywhere else).

I was talking about netnews, mormon.

> > I agree the list should be public usenet:
> > A mail gate-way to a usenet group that
> > ALSO permits unmoderated posts.  This
> > would be a nice way to combine a strict
> > moderated mail-list, with a standard
> > netnews group.
> 
> Er, what?
> 
> That paragraph makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

There's already hundreds of groups like
that, stupid.  It will be implemented,
whether you like it or not.


--

Kill Your Television

"qut" the imbecile writes:
> REAL crypto-anarchists, of course, want the 
> destruction of copyrights, trademarks, and
> other weapons of capitali$m, and will
> implement crypto-anonymonity to proceed
> forthwith.

No one speaks for all anarchists, or even anyone other than
themselves.

I realize that you are trolling, but, speaking for me, you're a
fruitcake.

.pm

> REAL crypto-anarchists, 

  Like the folks who brought us Tiannemen Square?

> of course, want the 
> destruction of copyrights, trademarks, and
> other weapons of capitali$m, and will





> Kill your Television

   Threw mine out in 1987. There's more people who don't have indoor
bathrooms, than don't have a TV. (source: 1990 Bureau of the Census). I'm
in a pretty elite group.