pretty good reputation

a pretty good detour. 

by what i understand pgp's "web of trust" scheme has flaws. according to 
pgp (alice trusts jane, jane trusts snoopy, bob trusts alice) implies 
bob trusts snoopy. this means that alice trusts jane to the extent, that 
if jane trusts a third person, then a fourth person who trusts alice 
automatically trusts that third person. deducing such results from a 
simple shades of trust system cannot lead to a reliable web of trust.
thats common sense.

what is required is a reputation system wherein trust is  _qualified_ 
rather than _quantified_. its senseless to say i trust him five units.
it will be more appropriate if pgp has a separate tag for "type of trust"
or something like that. 

this kind of thing can be difficult to handle, since it a fuzzy 
parameter. add to the problem a global-system like internet where all 
communication is not person to person. i was wondering if there are 
any working mathematical models for reputation systems, and how 
successful they are.

vipul ved prakash

On Sat, 15 Jun 1996, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:

> a pretty good detour. 
> 
> by what i understand pgp's "web of trust" scheme has flaws. according to 
> pgp (alice trusts jane, jane trusts snoopy, bob trusts alice) implies 
> bob trusts snoopy. this means that alice trusts jane to the extent, that 
> if jane trusts a third person, then a fourth person who trusts alice 
> automatically trusts that third person. deducing such results from a 
> simple shades of trust system cannot lead to a reliable web of trust.
> thats common sense.
> 
> what is required is a reputation system wherein trust is  _qualified_ 
> rather than _quantified_. its senseless to say i trust him five units.
> it will be more appropriate if pgp has a separate tag for "type of trust"
> or something like that. 

Concur.
I suggested this kind of taging of signatures coupled with specific yes/no
questions from pgp to narrow down the meaning and scope of trust extended
by a given signature.


> 
> this kind of thing can be difficult to handle, since it a fuzzy 
> parameter. add to the problem a global-system like internet where all 
> communication is not person to person. i was wondering if there are 
> any working mathematical models for reputation systems, and how 
> successful they are.
> 
> vipul ved prakash
> 
> 

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com