NODE 8eb4d666Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation
jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>Sat, 22 Jun 1996 09:10:34 +0800
At 06:51 AM 6/21/96 -0700, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>Two things:
>1. The letter was copied to Mark Heilbrun, and a phone number is helpfully
>provided below.
>2. D'Amato was copied to encourage him to claim jurisdiction over part of
>this legislation, yank it into the banking committee, and delay, delay,
>delay.
>
>-Declan
>declan@well.com
> United States Senate
> Select Committee on Intelligence
>
> June 7, 1996
> SSCI #96-2219B
>
> The Honorable Patrick J. Leahy
> United States Senator
> Senate Russell Building, Room 433
> Washington, D.C. 20510-4502
>
> Dear Pat:
[rest of letter to Leahy deleted]
Since "everybody" is supposed to agree that the Leahy encryption bill is
dead, dead, dead, I don't see this as being any kind of problem. It was
disliked by Clinton and the Denning-types, and with the exception of a short
flurry of mistaken optimism around here, it was roundly excoriated here as
well.
The one thing I found disgustingly amusing was the statement from the letter:
> Also, both the Congress and the
> Administration have undertaken to conduct a thorough analysis of a two-year
> congressionally-mandated study on federal encryption policy that was
> facilitated by the National Research Council. We therefore feel that your
> legislation initiative at this time is premature.
They seem to have to do an "analysis" of a two-year study. Harrummmph!
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
NODE a5851e57Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation
Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:25:51 +0800
On Fri, 21 Jun 1996, jim bell wrote:
> [rest of letter to Leahy deleted]
> Since "everybody" is supposed to agree that the Leahy encryption bill is
> dead, dead, dead, I don't see this as being any kind of problem. It was
> disliked by Clinton and the Denning-types, and with the exception of a short
> flurry of mistaken optimism around here, it was roundly excoriated here as
> well.
To which which Leahy Bill are you referring?
> Jim Bell
> jimbell@pacifier.com
---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com