CIA Fears UmpTeen InfoNukes

The New York Times, June 26, 1996, p. B7. 
 
 
   Head of C.I.A. Plans Center To Protect Federal Computers 
 
   By Tim Weiner 
 
 
   Washington, June 25 -- Alarmed at the growing threat that 
   computer hackers pose to national security, the Director of 
   Central Intelligence today announced plans to create a 
   "cyberwar" center to protect the bits and bytes that weave 
   the nation together. 
 
   The United States cannot be brought to its knees by a 
   madman with a modem. But the Director, John M. Deutch, said 
   the nation's intelligence agencies were alert to the threat 
   of "very, very large" attacks on the computers that run 
   Defense Department war rooms, power plants, telephone 
   systems, air traffic control centers and international 
   financial transfers. 
 
   "The electron," Mr. Deutch warned, "is the ultimate 
   precision-guided weapon." 
 
   Mr. Deutch said he was seeking to create a cyberwar center 
   at the National Security Agency, the giant electronic 
   eavesdropping branch of American intelligence. He said the 
   center could focus the Government's previously scattershot 
   efforts to understand and combat the threats posed by 
   governments, terrorist groups and mischievous teen-agers. 
 
   Mr. Deutch's first public statement about information 
   warfare came in testimony before Senator Sam Nunn, the 
   Georgia Democrat who called a hearing of a Senate 
   Governmental Affairs subcommittee to discuss the 
   little-understood, highly classified problem. 
 
   "There are some who believe we are going to have to have an 
   electronic Pearl Harbor, so to speak, before we really make 
   this the kind of priority that many of us believe it 
   deserves to be made," Mr. Nunn said. "Do you think we're 
   going to need that kind of real awakening, or are we fully 
   alerted to this danger now?" 
 
   Mr. Deutch replied: "I think that we are fully alerted to 
   it now. I don't know whether we will face an electronic 
   Pearl Harbor, but we will have, I'm sure, some very 
   unpleasant circumstances." 
 
   He added, "I'm certainly prepared to predict some very, 
   very large and uncomfortable incidents." 
 
   Mr. Deutch said cyberwar could become a 21st-century 
   national security threat second only to nuclear, biological 
   and chemical weapons. 
 
   Potential attackers may already possess the sophisticated 
   techniques they would need to bring off a cataclysmic 
   crash, many experts believe, but they still lack the deep 
   knowledge of their targets and direct access to the 
   computer systems they would seek to disable. 
 
   Military and civilian organizations are increasingly 
   dependent on evermore complicated and interlinked systems. 
   They run the risk of understanding the threat less and less 
   as it becomes more and more complex Mr. Nunn and Mr. Deutch 
   suggested. 
 
   Senator Nunn also said intelligence agencies have 
   communications problems with banks, telecommunications 
   companies and other business ventures vulnerable to cyber 
   attacks. 
 
   "There's a great reluctance by the private sector to 
   discuss the threat that they've faced or even the attacks 
   that have already occurred," he said, "because they fear 
   that the word would go out they're vulnerable, and 
   therefore could destroy or damage consumer confidence and 
   thereby cost them business." 
 
   "At some point," the Senator added, "there's got to be 
   communication here." 
 
   [End]

John Young wrote:

>    "The electron," Mr. Deutch warned, "is the ultimate
>    precision-guided weapon."

I'd like to claim this for potential use in a .signature, if nobody
else has thusly used it already.


By the way, there was a thing in the Yahoo/Reuters feed about "attacks"
on DoD computers; apparently British police arrested a "hacker" the
other day.  Anyway, the article included a claim that there have been
250,000 attempted break-ins on DoD computers over the past year.

Does anybody know how they count that?

______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX    * pain is inevitable  
       m5@tivoli.com * m101@io.com          *
      <URL:http://www.io.com/~m101>         * suffering is optional

On Wed, 26 Jun 1996, Mike McNally wrote:

> By the way, there was a thing in the Yahoo/Reuters feed about "attacks"
> on DoD computers; apparently British police arrested a "hacker" the
> other day.  Anyway, the article included a claim that there have been
> 250,000 attempted break-ins on DoD computers over the past year.
> 
> Does anybody know how they count that?

    Any time that someone doesn't successfully log into their computer, 
pings their site, fingers their site, does a nslookup on their site or 
anything else that constitutes an "attack."

                    Bruce M. * brucem@feist.com
        ~---------------------------------------------------~
        "Knowledge enormous makes a god of me." -- John Keats

> By the way, there was a thing in the Yahoo/Reuters feed about "attacks"
> on DoD computers; apparently British police arrested a "hacker" the
> other day.  Anyway, the article included a claim that there have been
> 250,000 attempted break-ins on DoD computers over the past year.
> 
> Does anybody know how they count that?

Pings & smtp verifies seem to be included in their counting.....


-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433