NODE fb2d83a6Fate of Ecash if RSA is cracked?
ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)Mon, 3 Jun 1996 09:26:23 +0800
Hello,
After reading Comm. of ACM and Schneier's book about ecash,
a question arose: what if the underlying public key cryptographic
scheme gets broken somehow? Suppose, for example, that someone
discovers an ultra-fast factoring algorithm or something like that.
What would happen with all ecash that's been issued? Of course
criminals would be able to forge large amounts of authentic-looking
ecash, so banks should not be honoring requests to convert e-cash into
real cash.
I apologize in advance is this question is silly, and will appreciate your
corrections.
- Igor.
NODE 5cc91c3eRe: Fate of Ecash if RSA is cracked?
dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)Mon, 3 Jun 1996 12:51:40 +0800
ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home) writes:
> scheme gets broken somehow? Suppose, for example, that someone
> discovers an ultra-fast factoring algorithm or something like that.
This'll happen, probably sooner than later.
---
Dr. Dimitri Vulis
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
NODE c474a5f1Re: Fate of Ecash if RSA is cracked?
ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)Mon, 3 Jun 1996 16:05:37 +0800
Dr. Dimitri Vulis wrote:
>
> ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home) writes:
> > scheme gets broken somehow? Suppose, for example, that someone
> > discovers an ultra-fast factoring algorithm or something like that.
>
> This'll happen, probably sooner than later.
>
Hm, how about using two public-key algorithms simultaneously (ie,
providing signatures made using two algorithms with each coins)? This
way, if one algorithm gets broken, there would be supposedly enough time
to make a transition to another method or at least honor the issued ecash.
Just curious.
Another question: what happens to the ecash issued by a bank if it's
secret keys get stolen?
Thanks,
- Igor.
NODE d91e62c1Re: Fate of Ecash if RSA is cracked?
gregmi@galileo.mis.net (Greg Miller)Tue, 4 Jun 1996 15:12:40 +0800
On Sun, 2 Jun 1996 23:47:32 -0500 (CDT), you wrote:
>Another question: what happens to the ecash issued by a bank if it's
>secret keys get stolen?
The same thing that would happen if someone were to steal the keys to
the bank, and the combination to the vault.
"Randomness is in the eye of the beholder" --Numerical Recipes
gregmi@mis.net (Greg Miller)
http://grendel.ius.indiana.edu/~gmiller/
NODE 4575fd67Re: Fate of Ecash if RSA is cracked?
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>Tue, 4 Jun 1996 05:41:40 +0800
Dr. Dimitri Vulis writes:
> ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home) writes:
> > scheme gets broken somehow? Suppose, for example, that someone
> > discovers an ultra-fast factoring algorithm or something like that.
>
> This'll happen, probably sooner than later.
Why do you assume that? There are plenty of problems that are
provably not solvable in non-exponential time even if P=NP. What makes
you think this one is going to be solved?
.pm
NODE c281b014Re: Fate of Ecash if RSA is cracked?
gregmi@galileo.mis.net (Greg Miller)Mon, 3 Jun 1996 15:11:21 +0800
On Sun, 2 Jun 1996 17:42:49 -0500 (CDT), you wrote:
>What would happen with all ecash that's been issued? Of course
>criminals would be able to forge large amounts of authentic-looking
>ecash, so banks should not be honoring requests to convert e-cash into
>real cash.
As I understand it, ecash shouldn't be withdrawn until shortly before it
is spent. If the RSA algorithm is broken, then then banks could refuse the
withdrawal (and depositing) of money as ecash. The remainder of the money in
each users' account would have to be withdrawn through conventional methods.
Of course all the outstanding (between withdrawl and deposit) ecash
could be a problem.
"Randomness is in the eye of the beholder" --Numerical Recipes
gregmi@mis.net (Greg Miller)
http://grendel.ius.indiana.edu/~gmiller/
NODE 1b03a771Re: Fate of Ecash if RSA is cracked?
Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>Tue, 4 Jun 1996 13:10:12 +0800
US SEcret Service was always on top of criminal counterfeiting. I make
that "criminal" distinction becaue there is allegedly a phenomenon of
low-intensity-warfare going on, with Iran sponsoring more-or-less perfect
counterfeits of hundred dollar bills.
Criminal counterfeiting was a dangerous game. Secret Service pretty much
knew every individuial/company who was involved in bona fide use of the
relevant papers, inks, engraving/printing equipments, etc., and anyone
ordering any of this stuff from the very limited number of suppliers, was
placed under watch. It's a small world out there, kids.
NODE c2e225bfRe: Fate of Ecash if RSA is cracked?
dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)Tue, 4 Jun 1996 15:59:38 +0800
Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net> writes:
> US SEcret Service was always on top of criminal counterfeiting. I make
> that "criminal" distinction becaue there is allegedly a phenomenon of
> low-intensity-warfare going on, with Iran sponsoring more-or-less perfect
> counterfeits of hundred dollar bills.
I wonder what would happen if someone posted PostScript code for printing
counterfeit money on a color printer? :-)
---
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps