NODE fcaed4d8Re: Anonymous stock trades.
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>Sat, 8 Jun 1996 13:26:51 +0800
hallam@Etna.ai.mit.edu writes:
> >He's a Cato fellow. I don't think that implies anything more than
> >he he gets some money from them.
>
> Nope, he is listed in "senior staff".
He's listed in the staff section, but he's clearly labeled as a
fellow. P.J. O'Rourke is also listed in the same column as a fellow. I
suppose he's working at Cato full time and only moonlights at Rolling
Stone. The fact that neither of them lives within striking distance of
Cato headquarters (O'Rourke lives in New Hampshire) makes your claim
ever more interesting.
> I'm working on digital signature systems under a DARPA contract.
We shall therefore have to declare you to be a U.S. Government employee.
.pm
NODE dcbd8784Re: Anonymous stock trades.
hallam@Etna.ai.mit.eduSat, 8 Jun 1996 11:58:43 +0800
Perry,
BTW, its not normally polite to post comments on personal mail to a
list. I thought the list had probably got bored with this nonsense long
ago.
> The fact that neither of them lives within striking distance of
>Cato headquarters (O'Rourke lives in New Hampshire) makes your claim
>ever more interesting.
Being listed as staff in my view makes one a staff member.
There have been interesting developments in telecommunications which
make it no longer necessary to physically reside where one works.
When I was a CERN fellow I was certainly on the payroll of CERN -
generally that is what "Fellow" means.
If Perry wishes to call me a fool for calling a person listed by the Cato
Institute as a member of their "staff" a member of the Cato institute staff then
I guess Perry has a different deffinition of "fool";.
Phill
NODE 841806b7Re: Anonymous stock trades.
Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>Tue, 25 Jun 1996 13:09:45 +0800
On Fri, 7 Jun 1996 hallam@Etna.ai.mit.edu wrote:
> I thought the list had probably got bored with this nonsense long
> ago.
>
Perhaps the first thing you've been right about in some time, *Dr.*.
- r.w.