NODE 7dc753a7ecash thoughts
Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>Thu, 4 Jul 1996 09:22:06 +0800
1) Current ecash systems require live verification of coins, which
will require banks to perform public key operations at around the 100K
PKOP/s level, as well as all the headaches caused by the serial number
lookup.
Would anybody care to price up a system to handle this kind of traffic,
assuming that coins can be given relatively short maximum lifetimes to
keep the number of serial numbers in use within semi-reasonable limits.
I'm wondering what the breakeven point is for only doing statistical
sampling when verifying low value coins.
2) If ecash is used to create a new currency- i.e. the value of a unit of
the ecash is not tied to any single existing currency, what should the
value of one currency unit be set at? (let's call it a Turing)
If the currency is run to be as anti inflationary as possible (e.g.
backed by index-linked government securities), one Turing should buy the
same amount of goods for a long long time, though relative prices may
change. What value is likely to give the most convienient prices to the
most goods? (e.g. +/- powers of two).
3) Not ecash, but still banking [noise]
I'm currently visiting at my parents house in England, which for the past
18 years has had a really nice phone number. Unfortunately, BT split
london into two area codes, and have reallocated the exchange number in
the other one to citibank. Unfortunately, not many of their customers can
quite cope with the concept of area-codes. Even more unfortunately,
neither can BT or citibanks telcom group- we've had calls transferred
from their switchboard straight through to us.
Now, here comes the test for cp ingenuity - can you think of the best way
to answer the phone to someone who things they've called a bank?
Ones I've used so far, when I've been really pissed off are:
Oh, I'm sorry - haven't you heard? They've filed for chapter 11. I'm from
the Federal Reserve- I'm working with the recievers - can I possibly help
you? [response was a disappointing "Good Heavens! Really?" ]
and the simple, yet subtle Lovecraftian terror of:
CitiBank, Nick Leeson speaking. [pause, giggle, must have a wrong number,
click]
Any more suggestions?
Simon
NODE 1bef98faRe: ecash thoughts
CyberEyes <cyberia@cam.org>Fri, 5 Jul 1996 05:36:04 +0800
On Wed, 3 Jul 1996, Simon Spero wrote:
> I'm currently visiting at my parents house in England, which for the past
> 18 years has had a really nice phone number. Unfortunately, BT split
> london into two area codes, and have reallocated the exchange number in
> the other one to citibank. Unfortunately, not many of their customers can
> quite cope with the concept of area-codes. Even more unfortunately,
> neither can BT or citibanks telcom group- we've had calls transferred
> from their switchboard straight through to us.
>
> Now, here comes the test for cp ingenuity - can you think of the best way
> to answer the phone to someone who things they've called a bank?
Act like a teller, get their banking information, then steal all
their money. er. Sure, it's bank fraud, but it's fun! :)
Ryan A. Rowe - Montreal, Quebec /Seeking Internet-related job!/
aka CyberEyes, Rubik'S Cube I will relocate _ANYWHERE_.
Tel. -> +1-514-626-0328 | __o o
E-Mail -> cyberia@cam.org | _ \<_ <\
WWW -> http://www.cam.org/~cyberia | __/\o_ (_)/(_) />
IRC -> #CAli4NiA, #Triathlon, #Surfing |
FTP -> ftp.cam.org /users/cyberia | swim bike run
Read my C.V. at http://www.cam.org/~cyberia/resume-e.html
"In lieu of experience, I have a willingness to learn."
"Everyone has their day, mine is July 15th, 1998."